User talk:ChupoKlasky1991
Welcome!
[edit]
|
ChupoKlasky1991, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi ChupoKlasky1991! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC) |
I'm sorry to hear you feel that way
[edit]With reagrds to your latest comment at WT:F1: Special:Diff/945070980. I'm sorry to hear that you feel wp:bitten. I hope I didn't bite you (please do tell me if I did). May I also say that you did make me chuckle when I saw Br*x*t
. I hope that you don't decide to leave the project over how you feel that you have treated in that discussion. Wikipedia always values new editors and whatever opinions they may have.
SSSB (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Rest assured, you didn't bite me. :) Nor did User:FORMULA1FAN71 and User:A7V2.
- Unfortunately, I have decided to leave. And, even more unfortunately, this decision is final.
- All the very best to you on Wikipedia and elsewhere in the future. :) ChupoKlasky1991 (talk) 17:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Offence
[edit]I am sorry you feel offended. As I stated multiple times I am striving only for clarity. Please do not assume offence where none is offered. I do not know you or anything about you. I have no idea what offends you. People come to wikipedia with many motives and not everyone's command of English is good. Having had to many arguements over many years for silly reasons I strive for clarity. If it comes off as impolite I can only assure you that is not my intent. --Falcadore (talk) 19:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Look at it from my perspective for a moment. I try to write something without any inflection and you tell me I am being "shirty". I deny it. I said "stay on topic" to try and direct you away from any debate on a subjective judgement like rudeness and you respond with a lengthy response about rudeness, something I had hoped to avoid. All because I can not convey to you the tone of my voice accurately with the written word. This was anything but rude. I am Australian, Brexit has no purchase here. I am an analytical person by nature so sometimes my words appear unemotional. If I try to break this down any further it will appear patronizing and I don't want to do that either. --Falcadore (talk) 03:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
[edit]Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.