User talk:Chronolegion

Welcome!

Hello, Chronolegion, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

ellol 21:26, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Better late than never), huge thanks for your additions to Lukyanenko-related pages! I still am a fan of SL, and feel just great to work with somebody on this project. Hope you'll enjoy to write and edit!! ellol 21:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars: Storm in the Glass

Instead of Star Wars: Storm in the Glass, I think the English title of the film is "Star Wars: Tempest in a Teapot." I would like to move the article to the title Star Wars: Tempest in a Teapot. Please let me know if you object. -- Jreferee 17:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't mind, but the official website lists the English name as "Storm in the Glass". I think we should stick to Goblin's name. Chronolegion 17:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some Wikipedia guidelines on the topic: Foreign-language films naming conventions and Russian names naming conventions.-- Jreferee 18:41, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that there are rules on Wikipedia and that the idiom "tempest in a teapot" might be more familiar to the English-speaking crowd than "storm in the glass", but I searched on Google and found that only the latter is used for the Goblin translation (not just on his website). One of the reasons for changing a name is to allow easier web search. I believe in this case it would be best to leave the name as it is, but add a trivia note to describe the idiom in English terms. Chronolegion 18:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 30 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Star Wars: Storm in the Glass, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Sam Blanning^(talk) 13:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hey good work. Could you help out with Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/List of films without article. I am currently drawing up an entire list of missing films Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to help, but I do not know that many movies, to be honest. Pretty much, that would depend on the movie and how well I remember it. Thanks for the offer. Chronolegion 12:53, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Haegemonia

Hi there

it feels weird spelling it like that but well i didnt know it was spelled like that in europe. old games like these lack information nowadays =( anyways is there any way we can add the US title somewhere in there so as people wont get confused??

Thanks Maverick423 16:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why not. If you want, you can add a note about this. If you do, you might want to mention that the names are different because of the spelling of the root word ("h(a)egemony"). Chronolegion 17:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good ill get right to it then Maverick423 17:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help!

thanks for your help on the Haegemonia article

and I liked your trivia that you added! I acctually didnt think much about it untill u mentioned it =) thanks again!Maverick423 16:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I thought about creating a new section for the inconsistencies, but many of those inconsistencies (e.g. sound in space, planet scale, static systems) are present in most other sci-fi games. Chronolegion 16:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that is true from the game a small one man fighter compared to earth's size looked like it would be the size of the empire state building. and i dont want to get into the colonization ships heh although i would expect thouse to be big. in anyways i await to see more from you =D take care Maverick423 16:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Planet Zoroaster

I noticed your addition of Zoroaster (The History of the Galaxy) in Planets in science fiction. Its placement there is fine for now; but I notice that there are several other planets listed in Template: The History of the Galaxy, and if you are planning on creating articles for those, you ought also to create a list page \which can be linked to directly from Planets in science fiction — something like "Planets in The History of the Galaxy". If there is not much information on some of these planets, then it would also be a good idea to put references to the less-described planets into this list instead of creating new articles for every single planet. See Planets in science fiction#Planet lists for comparable lists. RandomCritic 15:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This is probably what I will do, as, until I reread all the books, which might take awhile, I only possess limited info on each planet mentioned in the template. Certain planets might be worth mentioning in a separate article, though, like Elio (capital of the Confederacy and hub of Interstar) and Fort Stellar (HQ of Free Colonies' military during the Galactic Wars). Chronolegion 16:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ancient-Empires.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Ancient-Empires.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:False Mirrors cover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:False Mirrors cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Labyrinth of Reflections cover.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Labyrinth of Reflections cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Millennia Altered Destinies boxart.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Millennia Altered Destinies boxart.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:TachGate.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TachGate.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Tach starbase.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tach starbase.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Jake Logan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jake Logan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Tach starbase.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tach starbase.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:42, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TachGate.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TachGate.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:War Front Turning Point boxart.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:War Front Turning Point boxart.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mongols

I havent played that far into the game but yeah U should be able just to wipe them out. just like every other faction--Lord Haw Haw29 (talk) 23:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)Lord Haw Haw29[reply]

WP AH

This user wants you to join
WikiProject
Alternate History.

Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 14:01, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

X-COM: UFO Defense (Russian novel)

Thank you for writing the article, and doing so in a unconventional but very effective manner that maximizes its usefulness for readers.

In case you ever see this message, is the novel actually good? --Kiz o r 10:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I appreciate the comment. The novel is decent, but I wouldn't say that it was great. Character developmen is ok, but most of them end up dying anyway. The author sticks to the game a bit too much, if you ask me, while going off on a tangent a few times (like when adding a new race and not following up on that subplot). Some events are highly detailed, though. For example, the book describes the horror of watching one's friend being attacked an turned by a Chrysalid, as well as having to shoot him afterwards. Don't think it'll ever be officially translated into English - copyright issues and all that. Chronolegion (talk) 16:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of X-COM: UFO Defense (Russian novel)

I have nominated X-COM: UFO Defense (Russian novel), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-COM: UFO Defense (Russian novel). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Remurmur (talk) 09:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GalSpanLogo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GalSpanLogo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:55, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 16:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TwilightOfTheMindCover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TwilightOfTheMindCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Invasion (Russian Novel)

The article Invasion (Russian Novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references (Invasion "Mihail Ahmanov") failed to find suffifient support for this article to meet the requirements of WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 11:50, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CentauriDawnCover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CentauriDawnCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:22, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Logrians

The article Logrians has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and apparently fails to meet notability guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Nuujinn (talk) 13:24, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mikhail Akhmanov

The article Mikhail Akhmanov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

User does not seem to pass WP:AUTHOR and I cannot find any third party sources. Nothing in Google News, Google search turns up mostly WP mirrors and sites selling his books.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. N^oformation ^Talk 07:23, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fighters of Danveyt

The article Fighters of Danveyt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no indication of notability, has been unreferenced for years, consists almost solely of plot information, and the author's article was deleted due to lack of notability or even an assertion of importance. I can find no coverage of this book in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Atama頭 22:08, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dark Skies (novel)

The article Dark Skies (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no indication of notability, has been unreferenced for years, consists almost solely of plot information, and the author's article was deleted due to lack of notability or even an assertion of importance. I can find no coverage of this book in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Atama頭 22:08, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CentauriDawnCover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CentauriDawnCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Chronolegion. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Boy and the Darkness

The article The Boy and the Darkness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources for 6 years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Endercase (talk) 04:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chronolegion. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chronolegion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hypersphere (The History of the Galaxy) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hypersphere (The History of the Galaxy). Since you had some involvement with the Hypersphere (The History of the Galaxy) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 19:50, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Star Wars: Storm in the Glass for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Star Wars: Storm in the Glass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Wars: Storm in the Glass (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Donaldd23 (talk) 22:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Competitors (novel)

The article Competitors (novel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources or evidence of notability. It is just plot summary. Fails WP:NBOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib3005 (talk) 12:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Draft Universe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Draft Universe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Draft Universe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Labyrinth of Reflections cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Labyrinth of Reflections cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]