User talk:Christos200

November 2011

Your recent editing history at Greek military junta of 1967–1974 shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 13:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greek military junta of 1967–1974

Hello. Instead of edit-warring please go to Talk:Greek military junta of 1967–1974 to explain why you want to add a country-infobox at the junta article. Thank you. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 13:27, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one page into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 19:41, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text to Ottoman Empire from another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 21:48, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text to Turkey from another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 21:52, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text to Greece from another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 21:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text to Republic of China (1912–1949) from another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 21:57, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text to Italians from another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 22:08, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits

Please stop moving large amounts of GFDL-released text without attribution. Better still if you are planning to dump large amounts of text please discuss this on the talkpage of the article before you do so. However if you persist in following your current course you will reported. Consider this your final warning. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 22:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I expect you to respond and show that you understand what to do. If you don't, I will have to block you to protect the encyclopedia, as I warned you some time ago. 07:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs)

Ok. I am sorry. Just wanted to help.

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The relevant section is at: Continuing GFDL violations by User:Christos200. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 19:40, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. While we would love to have your help building Wikipedia, I'm afraid we do have to ask you to pay attention to and comply with policies.

You were told above, quite a few times, that you can't just copy content from one article to another. There are copyright issues with this. If you want to copy content from one article to another, you have to give credit to the original authors. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. This is what you've been blocked for - you were warned that you would be blocked if you continued, but you have started up again.

Beyond that, you should generally make sure that other people agree with copying tons of content from one article to another. If you think what you want to do may be controversial - that is, that somebody might have reasons not to do it - you should discuss it first on the talk page of the article. This helps you work more constructively with others.

I have no objection to your being unblocked, but I think we need to hear something from you first to convince us that you will not continue just copying stuff from one article to another without credit. This is important. You can't keep doing this. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:23, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]