User talk:Christophmahler

Frantz

Many thanks for these comments. Give me a day or two to give them proper consideration. --Smerus (talk) 13:02, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

By the way, please take the trouble to read WP:Civility. It may be that, as English is not your first language, you are not aware of the impression you create. But don't accuse your fellow editors of ignorance. We try here to deal with facts, not personal opinions.--Smerus (talk) 14:24, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Dear Christophmahler -as you will have seen, I have reverted to your wording on the main article, in the light of your comments and the comments made by others. May I still request you to read WP:Civility. If you take the trouble to do so, you will see that it has nothing to do with the nature of edits as such, but is about common courtesy to fellow Wikipedia editors. I quote - 'Incivility consists of personal attacks, rudeness, disrespectful comments....'. That means avoiding calling people ignorant, or accusing them without foundation (or explanation) of conflict of interest, or saying you are 'suspicious' about them, and so on - you might, while you are at it,also read WP:AGF. Please recall that Wikipedia is a cooperative venture, not a personal battleground. With best regards, and looking forward to the English article on Frantz --Smerus (talk) 10:09, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Dear user Smerus,

I have read WP:Civility and I explained already, that I have not made mere accusations.

Ignorance towards my offered references and a conflict of interest in denying any references from Your side can be proven on the talk page of the article on Opera and Drama, which sheds light also on Your point on assuming good faith towards my suggested changes of the article.

I see an obvious reason to take Your statements as an expression of double standard as long as Your actions are in contradiction to them. Prove that You can hold up to the standards, You refer to and I will take Your contributions serious again--Christophmahler (talk) 16:36, 10 July 2011 (UTC)