User talk:Christmasgirl

WP:3RR

Warning

Please keep the Wiki quailty standards and keep a neutral view. Keep current, read all facts and do more research and please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Black people. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This is your only warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to White people, you will be blocked from editing. Lukas19 09:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read & understand what you add to wikipedia

WP:3RR

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Black people. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Strothra 14:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive unsourced vandalism on Zanj

Warning

I have warned you about vandalism, just because you see another editor doing it doesnt give u license. Also your disruptive edits to wiki in general will inspir us to suggest a block. YOu do not develp articles you troll and create problems with your "politics". u have blanked this page which is not allowed. You have reverted an editor on Zanj a topic you just yesterday said you didnt know anything about now 2day you r an expert.If you want to have a forum style debate do not edit wiki, if you cannot follow the rules and develop this website please stop and allow us to do our serious work. Wikipedia:What is a troll--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ 16:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you have lost the argument at zanj, don't take it out on me Christmasgirl

U have been identified as a troll, you have reverted another editor for no reason that WP:POINT, dont see how i lost anything. but you have lost credit on this site.--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ 19:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Halaqah. From what I've seen you do, in just these few articles I have to wonder what your motives are. I don't know what to think about your actions. Are they political? Trolling? Self-serving? I dunno. But please consider taking a break as there are more than just a few people who have a problem with you. This is a collaborative, not one person taking control of an article. And please sign your posts with four tildes instead of three, it helps others follow the conversation and additions to articles as to what is old or new. Thank you. Jeeny 05:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki is not the place for your race politics

Your crisis should not be reflected here on wiki, If you want everyone to be mixed race as identified in your statements then discuss it on a forum not try to force this point into everyone page. This is trolling and disruptive when serious people edit here to a quality standard.--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ 19:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV dispute

Please carefully read Wikipedia:NPOV dispute#What is an NPOV dispute?F. Generally, when a POV tag is added, there is a NPOV dispute (though it does not always turn out that the article is biased). Jd2718 01:30, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Being an Admin

Hi. I am an Admin, but I really have no authority to tell editors how to edit or what opinions they should have of an article. I edit just like everyone else, but occasionally I use admin tools if editors are abusing the rules. If someone tags an article as POV and I disagree, I contend the tag not as an admin, but just like anyone else editing the article. Wikipedia admins are ordinary editors who undertake some additional responsibilities, such as general maintenance. Using ones admin privileges to influence the direction of a dispute is against policy. But thank you anyway. --Ezeu 01:39, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Oprah Winfrey and Barack Obama's senate seat

An article that you have been involved in editing, Oprah Winfrey and Barack Obama's senate seat, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oprah Winfrey and Barack Obama's senate seat. Thank you. Borock (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Da panda of pandemonium has given you a salad! Salads promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the goodness of salads by tossing one for someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Try to be a little more nuetral and kind while doing edit wars. I can see you have a few people ticked, so try to be more considerate on our beloved Wikipedia. You can do things nuetral, can you? Please at least try.

Hug da panda. DPandaOPande (talk) 22:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)DPandaOPande [reply]

Spread the goodness of salad by adding {{subst:Givesalad}} to their talk page with a friendly message.