User talk:Christine2901

Welcome! {{helpme}} According to wikipedia's own policies, a biographical article on a living person must have AT LEAST ONE SOURCE directly supporting it. I have put up many sources directly supporting this subject. But the message at the top of the article put up by MBK004 states that it is not sourced. That's incorrect. Everything in the article is totally accurate and this subject is all over Google.com. This can be easily checked. MBK004 blocked me arbitrarily saying I was being "Disruptive". He/She was the one being disruptive and unprofessional. Whoever that is ought to be made aware of an apparent bias of some sort. Others are now joining with me in contributing to this article and if it's deleted they will put it up again and continue to do so.

Christine2901 (talk) 21:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} MBK004 is warring with me about editing the article "John W. Flores". Whomever this is appears to have some sort of an attitude regarding this subject. This is a Mexican-American writer of significance and the article has been well-sourced. However, MBK004 continually puts up a message stating it is not correctly sourced, and has multiple problems. Mexican-Americans today encounter racism all the time and I think this editor is racist. This article seems fine. Perhaps someone can counsel MBK004 about his/her own disruptive/racist attitude regarding this important writer. Who has received many awards for writing about another important Mexican-American. We don't all work in the fields guys.

Christine2901 (talk) 21:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Thank you for previous assistance on creation of my article recently. I have attempted to link this article as it was designated an "orphan." Have tried to follow guidelines listed on Wikipedia for linking to other Wikipedia sites directly related to my article. But am not sure if I correctly attempted this. Could you assist one more time? The article is titled "John W. Flores" and please let me know what else I should do to the article so it conforms with Wikipedia guidelines.

{{helpme}} Christine2901 (talk) 01:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC) Hello, Christine2901, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as John W. Flores, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.[reply]

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 13:35, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John W. Flores

The article John W. Flores has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 13:35, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your message at Requests for feedback

	Hello Christine2901. Replies have been posted to your message at Requests for feedback. Please acknowledge the feedback and ask for additional assistance if you need it. If you do not respond to the feedback, your message and the replies thereto will be archived in a few days. Thank you!
	You can remove this notice at any time - click on this section's [edit] link and remove the section.

mⓞnⓞ 03:24, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from John W. Flores. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -MBK₀₀₄ 05:35, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you think you have completed the issues, DO NOT REMOVE ALL the tags unless another user has concurred with your assessment. There are still many problems with the article. -MBK₀₀₄ 05:37, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John W. Flores, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. IT IS UNACCEPTABLE TO CONTINUE THIS BEHAVIOR -MBK₀₀₄ 06:22, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at John W. Flores, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have continued to remove all tags even though the majority are still relevant. -MBK₀₀₄ 06:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for continued disruptive removal of maintenance templates after repeated warnings, as you did at John W. Flores. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -MBK₀₀₄ 07:13, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John W. Flores, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:47, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John W. Flores for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article John W. Flores, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John W. Flores until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Eskimo (talk) 19:39, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]