User talk:Chrisshorngod

The article Chris Salazar has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 20:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trant Batey

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Trant Batey, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Brianyoumans 16:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD notice Trant Batey

Another editor has listed an article that you have been involved in editing, Trant Batey, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trant Batey. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --Eastmain 17:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:WesternHeadshot-1-.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WesternHeadshot-1-.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Steven Seagal. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:47, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Steven Seagal. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:30, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]