User talk:Chrisphd/sandbox

Hi Junhe, Regarding the "cantilever" article, it seems that the Wikipedia article "Cantilever" already has a significant section on cantilevers in architecture. Are you suggesting something different? Or is there a significant amount (>=750 words?) that you can add to what is already there?

Adding to the James Joyce Bridge article would be fine except that I can't imagine you'll be able to find 750 words of information to add... or am I wrong?

For other topics, here is a list of requested articles in Architecture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Applied_arts_and_sciences#Architecture

here is also a list of Civil Engineering stubs that need expanding: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Civil_engineering_stubs

or bridge stubs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Bridge_(structure)_stubs

if you go to this page--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Civil_engineering#Tasks_you_can_do--you can scroll to the bottom and see links to other Wikiprojects that may interest you and find requested articles or stubs needing attention there...

Let me know if you need more help! EG EricGrunwald (talk) 19:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments (Jaeyune) 1. How about modifying the name of titles (for the sub-topics)? Could be more specific? 2. Where is the figure 1? 3. How about making sub-categoratizations for the "Construction Methods" sections? Jaeyune (talk) 22:28, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments (Prashant)

Good things about the article. 1. The first paragraph is very well written and summarizes the entire article very well. 2. A good listing of construction methods in the Methods section. 3. Overall a good writing.

Suggestions: 1. Could use cohesive devices to improve the flow in the article. 2. Maybe the headlines could be more informative? 3. Occasionally using a summary word or adjective clause could make the article reader friendly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Prashant Patil (talk • contribs) 23:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]