User talk:Chrismon

Disciple (Christianity)

First, generally it is considered rude to "blank" your talk page. Second, your contributions to Disciple (Christianity), while informative and constructive, are getting ever closer to original research. Please see Wikipedia:No original research for more information. -Acjelen 14:41, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed KingLloyd's "welcome" post because it is HUGE and would keep me from seeing other posts. Had I not looked at the history of my talk page I would never have seen your additional comments! I have once again removed that huge and all too colorful "welcome" post, please do not put it back. However, thank you for the advisement on not editing the page - as for regular comments I do not and did not plan to edit anyone's out.

As for Disciple (Christianity), If you disagree with the content, then please add your own research to the article - but I hope that your unsupported comment to me is not simply a reaction in disagreeing with what I have added to the article. If you believe I have added original work, please indicate where I have done so, so that I can edit the article and learn from our interaction. Please show what is not justified by citation or reference. Please be as rigorous in your rebuttle as I have been in my actual additions. In my perspective, every word I have added to the page that is not from the source material given (reference to and quotes from Luke 14) is simply a contraction. Please note that that contraction is from source material not only cited but given verbatum on the page, not only from the Christian scriptures (St. Luke and St. Paul) themselves but from published Christian ethicist, Lee C. Camp.

My concern was more to style and tone than content -Acjelen 16:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Chaplain

Hi, Chrismon,

Thanks for your most interesting edit to the article on Chaplain. I thought it a bit POV, but because of its importance I have added reference to a second example and set it into a separate sub-section 3.2 "Conflict with the Executive".

It should be possible to find a source for the statement that

    The US military states that "chaplains are free to proclaim and practice their witness without fear of reprisal"

but I couldn't - I wonder if you know of one?

Regards

Springnuts 23:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finger trouble - I accidently marked the previous edit as minor. Sorry! Springnuts 23:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank Springnuts. I did notice that you have a "citation needed" on the "chaplains are free to proclaim..." quote instead of the original citation web link I put up there. Though, you did leave it on the second quote. It is a first hand account from Lt. Col. Garland which I think would qualify as a proper citation. Chrismon 00:49, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]