User talk:Chrisch/Archive

Status: offline

What can I help you with?

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

This page is currently a bit messy... I plan to clean it up... eventually!

Hey there!

Ok well this is just a random page really... :)

--Chrisch 06:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol i love the link to ur own site :P good work XD

--Bjzaba 08:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yea its awesome i know :P

Chrisch 09:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy! (ean dlay) --Desalato 09:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cs92

I removed the PROD tag from User:Cs92 because the proposed deletion procedure only applies to the main namespace, not to the User namespace. --Metropolitan90 04:38, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect

Thanks for taken the S-protect off, I didn't know that it didn't work unless you had authorization. Randfan 21:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please subst warning templates

When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.

You forgot at User talk:75.57.124.138. Will (Talk - contribs) 08:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs

Thank you for adding {{stub}} to articles. However it is better to choose a specific stub to categorise them. Specific stubs can be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types. Please use these stubs where possibe instead of {{stub}}. Thank you. Ksbrown^talk 09:52, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: T-37

He already reverted your changes to Alex Carradine _SUBWAYguy 02:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

National Geographic Channel Incorrect

I attempted to clear up a lot of the mistakes you have on the National Geographic Channel page -but you removed them. The site is way off - its mixing US and International (which have separate ownership structures).

US Tagline is Dare to Explore (think Again only used overseas) US structures is 70% Fox Cable Networks, 30% National Geographic Ventures

that's only the beginning. I would suggest allowing changes to the site rather than trying to own something that is wrong.

Tvres 08:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re

Hey, I am looking into a better source but its maybe not the best idea to take that tone to long term editors who have been here a tad longer than yourself. Although I know that source is maybe not the best one to take the original Source (media week) is inaccessible to persons not a paid subscriber. - Mike Beckham 05:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually just found it now [1] - Mike Beckham 05:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

71.112.7.212 Issues

No problem on the revert. 71.112.7.212 is a troll and a loon. If he spent half the time he spends trying to "cover his ass" and channeled it into positive contributions, I think everyone would be happy and agree he's learned his lesson. But he's simply an idiot. Sorry if that flies in the face of WP:CIV, but I'll gladly take the heat for saying that because this user's non-blocked existance baffles me and makes the life of many editors on Wiki harder for no valid reason. Good luck in your Wiki contributions and thanks for the appreciation. --BaseballDetective 05:37, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Haha omg - YOU of all people dislikes vandalism of wikipedia!!! You crack me up

--Bjzaba 04:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Music Factory

If you actually have either Foxtel Digital or Optus TV Featuring Foxtel Digital, then go to channel 812 and you'll see that "The Music Factory" is currently running in preview mode ahead of it's official launch on Tuesday April 10, 2007. And that's also how I found out about it, all by doing a channel surf.

Foxtel (Satellite at least) is not currently running any preview for TMF, or intending to launch TMF. It is an exclusive arrangement with Optus Digital subscribers. MTV used to be and still may be an exclusive Optus channel which is why I believe Foxtel hasn't started it yet. Foxtel might not have the rights yet or something along those lines I'd say. If anyone has any more info on this situation please post it!

Smacca 10:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They're not running it on Foxtel cable either :)

Chrisch 12:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks - Associated Independent Colleges

response Zarius 13:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Aida (musical) mods

I'd like to understand why you recently removed the Other Productions section. I agree with your basic comment Wiki is "not a place for advertising" and the info was added not as advertising but as a historical record that there are other productions of the play. If we wish to be consistent, then the entire listing of locations and dates for the Aida tour (and other Wikis ... see Josh Groban, for example) should be removed. I don't understand why it's okay to keep one and get rid of the other. Perhaps the "at 7pm" made the other productions sound like advertising ... if so, that could have been removed and the historical record kept.

By the way, some of the "Other Productions" info was already there when I did my edits. I added a separate section to differentiate it from the touring company, and compressed the listed performances into a single line for each location, consistent with those listed for the touring company. It was my expectation that others could add items to this list in the future and expand/preserve the historical record. Perhaps you'd like to reconsider your edits? Thanks. Truthanado 11:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A response can be found on your talk page. :) Chrisch 07:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks for the explanation. Truthanado 23:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking

Well at least I hope I blocked him correctly. I've only ever blocked anons before, but I think I jumped through the right hoops. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I completely forgot the rule about not feeding the trolls, and I was paying for it. Thanks for the help, and now I can stop slapping my forehead for getting into it. How do people like that ever find any happiness, man? He just seems so introvertedly destructive. Arcayne 06:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asiarooms

I speedy deleted it. This IP is doing all sorts of rubbish which I am chasing. --BozMo talk 08:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

chrisch, you might have misunderstood. i removed a personal attack (against me) from arcayne's user page. that's not "page blanking" 71.112.7.212 15:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry chrisch-- you're wrong

calling people trolls is a personal attack. i think so, and if the attack is aimed towards me, that's what counts.

please do not contact me again, you are a biased admin looking for an excuse to harrass me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.112.7.212 (talk) 04:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

A response to your comment appears on your talk page. Chrisch 05:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem!

Always here to help. :) --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 08:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

userpage protection

No worries, mate. Just changed the template so that it goes into the proper cat, hope you don't mind (I know the blue lock is prettier! :p ) – Riana ^talk 09:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this...

Look here at who is crying out for help...lol.--David Shankbone 05:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting on Bo Taylor

I've been trying to deal with this user's vandalism for the past two days and it just keeps getting worse. I finally reported him on the Administrator Intervention Against Vandalism page. I hope that helps, although he also seems to be doing a lot of vandalism via anonymous IP addresses. --Proofreader J-Man 01:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks for reverting on Bo Taylor

No problem :) If it has not already been reported, what's the IP address he's using? Chrisch 01:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Actually, there are several:

71.247.182.92
71.195.67.241
71.247.196.225
71.247.183.94
71.247.153.60
71.247.174.53
71.247.165.54

That takes us as far back as 3/20/07. There are more before that (check out the history page of Bo Taylor). I don't know enough about how IP addresses work to understand how you would report one of them. I noticed that almost all begin with 71.247 if that means something. --Proofreader J-Man 01:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your help! It looks like someone finally deleted Bo Taylor, but I'll bet you anything he tries to recreate it (as he did with WHAA-TV). They didn't delete his other "figment of his imagination" articles, but the subst-prod tags are still on (for the time being.) So far no evidence that they plan to block him, and my comment on the Adminstrator Intervention page is no longer there. --Proofreader J-Man 01:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Foxtel article

Hi Chrisch,

Thanks for the info. I made the changes to the Movie channel names because they are typed without using CAPS in every other situation (EPG, channel websites, channel articles, reviews etc). If you're determined to use the Foxtel channel list as the one and only source for channel naming, then maybe you need to change Arena, World Movies, Foxtel Box Office, Fox Sports, The Comedy Channel etc all to CAPS aswell. All things aside though, it's stupid that some are in caps and some aren't. I think Foxtel used this method for their analogue services, but now only a hand full of channels are in CAPS officially, like ARENA, FUEL TV, MAX and anything abbreviated. And I say officially by looking at my Foxtel box EPG which in my opinion would be more updated than Foxtel's aging website. I reckon we should change them. Love to hear your thoughts. :)

Smacca 10:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for protecting my user page. :) TwoOars ^{(T | C)} 02:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Vandlism

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. It is much appreciated. --Dynamo_ace 13:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Aida (musical)

I can understand your reverting the Nextstage edits (which removed all the non-existent wiki links) but you also deleted my addition that provided a summary of the "Current U.S. national non-Equity touring cast (2006)" section. If that was intended, would you please include that in your Edit Summary. As a side note, it seems that the entire list of cities and venues have been added back in by an unknown user, even though they were (correctly, in my opinion) removed earlier. My summary was intended to be a fair and noteworthy replacement of the list. I have added a comment to the article's Talk page which, hopefully, will resolve that. Truthanado 04:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Real People's Champion

Sorry but I am really new to wikipedia and I do not understand how to do it. User: Big Boss 0

Bomb

I do not see how my edit to bomb was vandalism. If you could lead me in the correct direction, I would be greatly thankful. In case you were wondering, my pronunciation was correct in IPA. Thanks!
69.161.213.251 20:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A response to your question has been posted on your talk page. See: User talk:69.161.213.251. Another user has also asked about the edit, and my reasoning for reverting it is displayed here: Talk:Bomb

Chrisch 03:32, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Global warming bias - not

... Full discussion is shown on the proper talk page: User talk:71.211.241.40

Chrisch 03:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

I'm confused by your message to me; I thought it was appropriate to put back speedy delete messages if they were removed by users? _SUBWAYguy 02:58, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Technically yes, but not more than 3 times per user, otherwise you risk violating the three-revert rule. If a user removed a speedy tag more than once, report the user straight away. Chrisch 03:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will try to follow that from now on _SUBWAYguy 03:07, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

warnings

chrisch -- the warnings are archived. anyone can look at them at anytime.

they are inaccurate. i have not vandalized any pages. do i have to keep 15 vandalism warnings on my page? everyone that comes assumes they must be correct without looking into thd etails. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.112.7.212 (talk) 05:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Semi-protection

Hi, apparently somebody vandalaised Hamas with different IP address[2]. How can this article be semiprotected?--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 10:22, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV

Please use {{ipvandal}} instead of {{vandal}} for IPs. Thanks. -- Netsnipe ► 13:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder - Aida (musical)

Thanks for the reminder. It has been taken care of. Truthanado 22:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

WP:AIV

Please use {{ipvandal}} instead of {{vandal}} for IPs. Thanks. -- Netsnipe ► 13:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder - Aida (musical)

Thanks for the reminder. It has been taken care of. Truthanado 22:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grey is not a Padua school colour

You said over half the padua uniform colour is grey, this is true, but by that logic, pretty much every school in brisbane should also have their school colours down as grey, because thats how the brisbane private schools uniforms look.

If you look on any piece of Paduan sporting clothing, which uses the true Paduan colours of brown, gold and white, there will be no grey. That is because grey is not a colour of the fransiscans and not a colour of Padua College. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.45.131.93 (talk) 04:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

RE: report to AIV - Jade Goody

Thank-you for reporting a vandal to AIV. In the future, please use the correct reporting format - simply stating their username and a description isn't very helpful, as it creates more work for admins in fixing your post before they are able to block. An example of the template that should be used can be found at the top of the WP:AIV editing window. Chrisch 08:46, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies - thought I had used the correct format, but can see now the mistake I made. Perhaps formats should be explained in the Editor instructions on the page, rather than just in the edit notes? Rgds, - Trident13 09:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, will Marist College Ashgrove's school colours be changed to grey blue and gold as well? Seeing as their socks are grey, their shirt is grey or white and so are the shorts/slacks.

Just trust me on this one, it pains me to see grey there. I was a former student of Padua, still coach sport at Padua, and my father has worked there for nearly 15 years. Grey is not a paduan school colour

VandalProof Application reply

I have tried to use Twinkle to do Revert(VANDAL) 22 times, and on my logged off IPs 16 times, while totalling reverted edits...5 times. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mister1nothing (talk • contribs) 16:50, 25 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I'm sorry.

Sorry that I abused the WP:AIV, I'll be more careful next time. TheBlazikenMaster 12:37, 30 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Re:Eric Cartman

You're mostly welcome. Also, kudos on the structure of your talk page.--Orthologist 13:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

semi-protection policy

Chrisch you might be interested in putting in your two cents worth on this discussion. Someone else feels the semi-protection policy could do with clarification to make it less arbitrary. I am letting you know about this because I noticed you had a bunch of protection requests knocked back recently. [3] Ttguy 22:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Queensland Youth Choir

Hi, the reason I removed the 3 categories was that an article should not normally be in both a category and a subcategory (WP:SUBCAT). Since the article is already in Category:Australian choirs I saw no reason to keep it in the parent categories (Category:Choirs and Category:Australian musical groups). As far as Category:Choral musical groups goes, it is a really small category that duplicates Category:Choirs and should be emptied and deleted in my opinion. I'd like to remove all three again, but if there is any special reason you think they should be kept send me a message. Best wishes/ Pax:Vobiscum 13:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply, you're fast. :) Pax:Vobiscum 13:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot generated edits

Greetings. I read through User:Lightmouse's edit history and talk page after seeing your listing on the VIP noticebnoard. I agree that the apparently bot-generated edits are unusual, and reverted a few, but indications are they aren't intended as actual vandalism. So, instead, we have a content or formatting issue. I've left a note on Lightmouse's user page expressing concern and will check in again later. Cheers, --Fire Star ç«æ 06:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Warnings on User talk:121.45.101.97

Thank you for your comment this user has been reported to WP:AIV by me already. I appreciate your point of view regarding further warnings - but do not entirely agree. Adding warnings maintains a record of the type of vandalism that such an address makes and if shared provides a legitimate user with an even greater reason not to be associated with the anon IP account but rather to create a user name.--VS ^talk 09:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:AIV

The sockpuppet was obvious, and has shown a addiction to vandalism. The AIV states that blatant vandals will be reported there, and since Redandproud22 and Redandproud21 are obvious socks, and have shown to be vandal only accounts, the quicker the block is put, the better. --Dark Falls ^talk 09:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapeshifter_%28band%29

You have incorrectly reverted an edit of this page. I am not a vandal and the information is valid. Please reverse your action.203.109.222.199 02:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Thanks for the report at AIV...the exact kind of good, clean reporting we need :). Keep up the good work! Jmlk 1 7 05:46, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response: Please use preview

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again.

Chrisch^Talk 05:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Will do! Thanks!-041744 20:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Charles, Missouri

Hello, I did add something to the "St. Charles" portion. The comment was in response to the "boys and girls frolicking on the river" ...that sounds extremely stupid. The second about REAL Irish beer at the Irish festival was a correct and positive observation about that particular festival.

Have a nice day.

71.81.247.112 05:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ix Chel "vandalism"

You called my editing Ix Chel "vandalism", which is nonsense: Having removed a passage, I substituted another, nearly identical, but slightly improved one for it.77.162.130.139 11:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mohrahit

Thanks Chrisch. I will work on that and re-apply soon. Regards --Mohrahit^Talk

about the date formating

I hope this is the right place to answer. ISO 8601 date format is an international standard. Wikipedia is international. So i think it is best to use this formation so there will be no misunderstandings, like 03.04.05 could be DD-MM-JJ or JJ-MM-DD or MM-DD-JJ and so on. Also iso 8601 is sortable. My reason in the first place was to make the Comparison of media players look more uniform. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.167.202.224 (talk • contribs) on June 15

Norfolkline

hi,

You have reverted some changes that I am making to the Norfolkline entry - the changes I am making reflect our new website and more accurately reflect our company - can you please revert them?

Thanks

Declan —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.172.150.254 (talk • contribs) on June 16

Re: Talk:False awakening

Nah i won't bother with reverting the page, but may i ask you to go read the talk page again... there really isn't a piece of real info on the page... Sharing an expierience...

( Yea i use ... (ellipsis) wrong, but I like them :)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.15.238 (talk • contribs) on June 16

Draw plays

Isn't Michael Vick a QB that can be related to this article? :S He is the QB with the most rushing yards!

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.252.65.41 (talk • contribs) on June 19

chess

The fact of the matter is increasingly being recognised as one of the fastest growing as most competitive international sports.

http://www.olympic.org/uk/sports/recognized/index_uk.asp http://www.chathurangam.com/news/olympics.asp

Chess is a sport. The main object in the game of chess remains the achievement of victory. Max Euwe

Well i'm not sure who you are but i'm a player, i play for my school's first iv chess team. I've played for five years in the Aic which means i was there back in 03 when it kicked off. I've won premierships and received Aic penats just like every football or cricket player. I've written results for the sports pages of the newsletter. I report to the sportsmaster the succeses of my team. And while the Aic is always the gps, GPS chess results are published in the sports results section of the courier mail.

Despite all this the most compelling evidence i can present is my own experiences. When tactics fail gamesmenship prevails. I've seen rivalries, i've seen hatred between opponents, i've furiousness that can not be matched by contact sport.

Leysan

Just curious but did you mean to do this or was it something else? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 14:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problems. I thought that was it but just wondered if I had made a mistake. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 08:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

What "Vandalism" did I do in the Mutual Intelligibility article? I believe the changes I made reflect much better the actual situation, and you're not a Romanian speaker to know better. And the "to a practical extent" part is taken from another wiki article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.120.210.195 (talk • contribs) on June 16

Songwriters

Hello Chrisch, I am categorizing the musicians from my country Cyprus and since you are a member of wikiproject Music, I would like to ask you something. When someone who is considered composer can be considered songwriter and when not? When someone who is considered lyricist can be considered songwriter and when not? If you know I will appreciate if you answer.--KRBN 20:55, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I will put in the info can you please just start the page--Mason19464 04:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Hey

I will put in the info can you please just start the page--Mason19464 04:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: Edits to Template:Reported

What do you mean???..--Cometstyles 12:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Associated Independent Colleges

Per discussions at talk:Public Schools Association this is not allowed. Some could also argue that the articles themselves identify the schools enough, and as such links to the schools article on wikipedia is good enough. Personally, i feel the images look good, and are purely an aesthetic touch, that is against fair use, and hence should be removed. Thoughts...please reply on my talk. Cheers. Twenty Years 12:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

sorry i was trying to do research on who could still wrestle for ecw oh and can u take ron simmons off the wwe roster as a wrestler —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.207.165.191 (talk) 20:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting my edit?

WTF are you talking about? The only thing I changed in my last edit was an update to the all time record. If you'd take the time to see who took the time to input the entire all-time history on the page, you'd see that it wasn't vandalism. Wpride33 21:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Question

Nessuna offesa, ma qual è il suo interesse a Padova Collegio? Hai dichiarato te stesso come qualcuno che non frequentano (nonostante le solide prove), ma di controllare la pagina come se siete di Adolf Hitler. Non pensate che lei sta prendendo un po 'troppo in là?

Aucune infraction, mais quel est votre intérêt à Padoue College? Vous avez vous-même déclaré que quelqu'un qui n'a pas assisté (en dépit de preuves solides), mais vous permet de contrôler la page comme si vous êtes Adolf Hitler. Ne crois que ce que vous prenez un peu trop loin?

No offense, but what is your interest in Padua College? You have declared yourself as someone who does not attend (despite solid evidence), but you control the page as if you are Adolf Hitler. Don't think that you are taking this a little too far? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freedomfighter1112 (talk • contribs) 12:40, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Foxtel Channels

Hello, NITV has started showing previews on :Foxtel, so its it okay I put it back into the list? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffmister (talk • contribs) 22:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your censorship of my posting.

My posting on Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction where you censored the objectively true statements: "Great controversy was generated when stockpiles of these weapons were not found in large numbers. Small numbers of weapons created prior to the 1991 Gulf War have been located, including artilliary shells designed to hold chemical weapons and mustard gas." with the objectively false statements: "Great controversy was generated when stockpiles of these weapons were not found."

Please note the following links which contain news stores and U.S. Congressional data which substantiate the information I posted and show the information you posted to be obejctively false:

News Stories: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50746 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120137,00.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1120720,00.html http://www.spacewar.com/2004/040701203743.9i07uh3m.html http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,120268,00.html

U.S. Congressional Report: http://www.wnd.com/redir/r.asp?http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf

These items together show evidence that 1) chemical weapons including mustard gas and artilliary shells designed to hold chemical weapons were found in Iraq, 2) these weapons were of a limited number (aproximately 500 as of June 2006's Congressional report), and 3) these weapons were created prior to the 1991 Gulf War.

Combined this makes my statement to be unambiguously and objectively true. It makes the statement you reverted to to be unambiguously and objectively false. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.216.117.86 (talk) 03:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Internet,

I'm sorry you were offended when I pointed out your errors and then fixed them for you. I know that the Internet is busy and doesn't have the time to copyedit everything it does. I shouldn't have been so crass as to imply that you, the Internet, were personally responsible for your (that is, the Internet's) content.

I am honestly flabbergasted that the note attached to my edit was interpreted as an attack on anyone. It is a humble request from someone so bothered by misuse of hyphens as to waste his time making ignorable changes to Internet pages. Can I please stop capitalizing Internet now? Thank you.

Sincerely,

The Internet User #97.81.104.145 Tilde Tilde Tilde Tilde I mean 97.81.104.145 (talk) 06:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: please find enclosed one (1) heartfelt apology, one hundred and eight (108) words of sincere confusion, and also one (1) reminder that 97.81.104.145 (talk) 06:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC) IN BASE FOUR I'M FINE 97.81.104.145 (talk) 06:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC) the Internet is Serious Business (S.B.).[reply]

Is the following correctly cited?

Theories in the aftermath of the 2003 war

The post-Saddam WMD search began with the fall of Saddam Hussein as ruler of Iraq and the occupation by Coalition forces. Great controversy was generated when stockpiles of these weapons were not found in large numbers. Small numbers of weapons created prior to the 1991 Gulf War have been located, including artilliary shells designed to hold chemical weapons, sarin nerve agent and mustard gas.^[1]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Chrisch! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Cheers, ✎ Peter M Dodge ( Talk to Me • Neutrality Project ) 01:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TTT.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TTT.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in QCC

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on QCC, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because QCC is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting QCC, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 05:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism?

I recieved a message from you with regards to me "vandalizing" the article for New Pittsburgh Arena. I have never edited that page, and frankly if I had actually vandalized it it would have been something clever and not just "porn palace."

If it was in fact a user with my IP address editing this article, I can assure you that it was neither me no anyone else in my household that was responsible for the vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.65.219.230 (talk) 20:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what i do now

i cant understand you message i want to upload a raman singh photo tell me method to upload

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 220.245.180.135 lifted or expired, well not exactly, see below.

Request handled by: -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 14:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have referred this to WP:OPP for checking. Daniel Case (talk) 13:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chrisch. Your ISP's caching proxy has recently been tunnelling traffic for an open proxy, which is why it has been blocked. While we look into this further I have granted you an IP block exemption. As suggested on that page, please don't go using any anonymising proxies for now. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 14:26, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your quci Chrisch. Very quick

) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seahawks1406 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sandee

Hi! I noticed that you brought back the two tags in that article. Those issues have now been resolved (hopefully, it was a headache for me at least) and the author will try to turn it into a good-looking article. So, why did you place again those tags? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:00, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the header is also the name of the article. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:05, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback can be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! — Aitias // discussion 12:10, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

i have a photo of raman singh

which i had to put his page tell me method to upload that —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pkatela (talk • contribs) 14:20, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chrish

That my edit in the 25 December page was just a test to see how long would it take for someone to notice it. I did it because I wanted to make sure Wikipedia can efficiently defend itself from vandalism before deciding on contributing to it. I hope you can pardon me for that :) (Pedro Abreu) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.37.119.150 (talk) 15:11, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SST_Inc. page

Thanks for the push Chrisch. I went ahead and edited a page that had related content complete with references. Sorry for the misunderstanding on deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Webanalyst (talk • contribs) 15:16, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pge

Thanks for the recent reversion on my talk page. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 14:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the kind words. I just have one request? Where do i get the online template and the vandel level template? Thanks! :)--Irunongames • play 15:38, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

no

id dint do it.

Thank You

Oops sorry I will use the preview button next time. Thank you for your messages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Autisun (talk • contribs) 16:46, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

comprmise

Hey,I appologize about My comments, I understand that Im don't meet the standards for being an admin but I wasn't up set about that,I was made because You still think im a vandal, Im not and you don't know the whole story behind it(If you want to know Ask me) Im sorry for the way I responed and I hope we both can work together to help better wikipedia-Please Respond on my talk as you have been-It's Me :) O Yea its me.. Washington95 (talk) 17:34, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are You Going to Reply?It's Me :) O Yea its me.. Washington95 (talk) 22:46, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ACC

Thank you for applying to access the ACC tool. As a tool administrator, I have decided to give you access. You may now utilize the tool here - however, before you do so please read the tool's guide due to the nature of the tool. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on freenode irc, and also join the mailing list

Please remember that the ACC tool is powerful, and that misuse may result in your access being suspended by a Tool Administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any questions, and once again welcome to the ACC tool.

Stwalkerster [ talk ] 18:42, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the article doesn't support the idea that we know he was gay.

However I don't want to cause an edit war so I'm trying to find midle ground.

thank you for your support. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fchucker (talk • contribs) 05:58, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

without explanation?

come on now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fchucker (talk • contribs) 06:06, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice job trying to find a middle ground. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fchucker (talk • contribs) 06:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No you just threaten anyone who dares to disagree with you.

and my observation is proven.

That's just and idea...no fact whatsoever —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.120.175.224 (talk) 06:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky

Hi Chrisch. I am leaving you a quick note to inform you that you are just about to violate 3RR and are currently involved in a edit war. I ask that instead of continually reverting (assuming you have tried communication as you have) you either 1) file a report at WP:AN/EW 2) request a third opinion 3) consider other forms of dispute resolution or 4) consider starting a thread at WP:ANI. The one thing you do not want to do is continually revert, and be warned that continuing to revert will result in a block. Second issue is that you chose to use rollback on those edits when it was clear they were not vandalism, and as such you could have your rollback privileges removed. I am going to assume good faith here in hopes this will not escalate, but if it does and you continue to use rollback I will remove it. I am also going to be leaving a note with the other user and will block if needed. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 06:25, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

scott shriner

he wasn't attacked by himself, either. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.210.81.83 (talk) 06:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of rollback

Please consider this your final warning, edits such as this should not be reverted using a tool such as rollback. Tiptoety ^talk 06:53, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

commited identity

Not really sure what to do there and since we're talking about authentication, I'm not comfortable making the change. I'm not sure where to send you for help either. BTW, I've unprotected your user talk page per Wikipedia:Protect#User_pages. Toddst1 (talk) 09:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did a little research and it appears that Mangojuice (talk · contribs) was the creator of this scheme. Perhaps he or she can help. I wish I knew more here. Toddst1 (talk) 09:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi

sorry I couldn't help it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.167.111 (talk) 09:54, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well

http://img.4chan.org/b/res/106285287.html#106289423 this will explain —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.167.111 (talk) 09:58, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok

well i guess i wasn't clear, and I do understand that and I won't make any more changes, but it was a good reason. trust me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.167.111 (talk) 10:03, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Perhaps I made a mistake? I have explained my edit on my page. Thanks.--85.226.44.74 (talk) 12:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

¿¿??

I blanked the SANDBOX, not a normal wikipedia page. What's the problem on doing so? 62.57.212.212 (talk) 13:23, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah well ok.. but the point is that as far as I know, there's a bot that uses to clean the page and restablish that table each 5-10mins... 62.57.212.212 (talk) 13:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It may be each 12 hours at this hour, but I know for sure that the bot called ClueBot may clean it each 5 minutes, like I've seen on 21pm CET. Maybe it depends in #edits of the people, don't know :P.

Anyways, you've reason in one thing, I shouldn't have deleted the table, I'm sorry :P. 62.57.212.212 (talk) 13:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

are you serious?

Why are you removing the edit to the family foundation school wiki?CoreEpic (talk) 13:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC)CoreEpic[reply]

Extreme nationalism in Wikipedia

The vandalism, is keep the nationalistic propaganda by user DIREKTOR, againts Criminal International Law, wikipedia is under this law, please take a look all the interventions of this person, doesn`t exist control for the info, and used the wikipedia political to keep the neo-comunist ideas, protect the etnich cleaner in the region, forget important facts, etc. I`m not a nationalistic person, but figth with this person is very difficult, changes all my works, within any source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.8.76.229 (talk) 13:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DB schenker / Schenker AG

Hello

Please note the changes to EWS article and the rebranding of that business to DB schenker, please note that DB schenker and Schenker AG though closely related (EWS has inherited the schenker name) are not the same organisation.

Hence I attempted to creat a stub for this company.

http://www.dbschenker.com/site/logistics/dbschenker/com/en/schenkerag/schenkerag.html

"Schenker AG is the parent company of over 100 subsidiaries spread throughout the world and is one of the central pillars of DB Schenker"

It seems that Deutche Bahn has used the schenker name it now 'owns' as one of its subsidaries in a closely related subsidary - did that make sense?

Could you possibly revert your revert?

UPDATE

I've made the changes myself -please see the german language wiki pages for more details of the differences between the two organisations. I've included a language link on the db schenker page to the german version - you will see that there are articles for both companies for a reason.

Clearly the DB schenker article is still a stub, but there is not much I can do at present - especially given the uncertainty regarding the rebranding of railion and the current event status of the rebranding of ews.

Please add to this article if you can.

Also note that the schenker AG article may now require updating given the rebranding. I am not an expert in this area so will not attempt this myself.

Thank you for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.88.238 (talk) 14:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted Sandbox

I noticed that you warned and reverted the sandbox here. Huggle has a whitelist feature in one of the queue options that will prevent the sandbox from showing up. It also has options to limit the queue to certain name spaces only. -- Nn123645 (talk) 16:04, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that :) It was only reverted because the "please leave this line alone" template was, well, not left alone! Haha!

Chrisch^Talk 06:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you speak Farsi? No you don't so I know better then you how It's spelled or prenounced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.209.91.80 (talk) 06:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's just sad why did I get warned? It's a crime to speak a language you can't? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.209.91.80 (talk) 06:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Oh, okay! I thought it was to be added there, seeing the references heading. Anyway, what I put is true, the love interest thing. Beejay1234 (talk) 06:31, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is no attacking at all you are just taking it all rong QQ. happy new year. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.209.91.80 (talk) 06:37, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vector Engineering

If i cant remove the tag from Vector Engineering then who can? —Preceding unsigned comment added by E smith2000 (talk • contribs) 06:39, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) E smith2000 (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Christmas was yesterday: Happy New Year!

Happy new Headcheese!-hexa Chord ² 07:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Heroes 2

What's confusing is looking for Heroes 2 (ie the TV sci fi series) and being redirected to something completely different. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.8.53.116 (talk) 11:01, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For your Information

I posted an edit on "mahram" because that information is not authenticated and may give a mislead to muslims, i respect ur concern but as i am a muslim so i have the right to say my words as well, that information contains some conflicting material that is whey i wrote that:

(This information is not authenticated by any muslim scholar or Alim,information may or may not be correct) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.61.226 (talk) 06:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I just wanted to tell u that this page is if referenced so please give me the link

I want my "Authentication", with all due respect, and saying that this information is referenced and then not providing the necessary reference proves that it is not referenced

Thank You P,S Provide the link as soon as possible on your talk page —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.61.226 (talk) 06:14, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to know

If u are a muslim u will have the sense to first authenticate the information, and if not it is my request that a muslim moderator is hired for articles related to muslims

thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.61.226 (talk) 06:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Buddhist Nation

What is up with your warning on Buddhist Nation???

Do you not think people looking for Buddhist countries would type "buddhist nation" or something???

And why does it deserve a warning???

70.29.208.129 (talk) 06:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article in question has been proposed for deletion for advertising, so I doubt your edit will have remained anyway.

Chrisch^Talk 06:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You gave me a warning for it. Why? And why does it matter that it's been prodded? If a person looking for "Buddhist countries" typed it it, they still wouldn't find it. Giving this sort of warning out seems like you want a WP:AN or something. Especially, since you haven't removed it. 70.29.208.129 (talk) 06:46, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To do what you are trying to achieve, it would be better to create a redirect on the currently non-existent page Buddhist nations or Buddhist countries (as you just suggested) rather than on a Buddhist Nation topic article, which wouldn't particularly be used as a search topic anyway, as it is improper English when speaking in multiples, and there are more than one nations relating to Buddhism.

I have decided not to dispute your editing test further, and will leave it up to other editors to determine its suitability, should the article actually be allowed to remain.

Have a good day :)

Chrisch^Talk 06:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should try typing in "buddhist nation" into the search box and see what you get. Then you can read WP:SINGULAR and Wikipedia:Hatnote, and familiarize yourself with disambiguation, since you still claim that being helpful is testing. 70.29.208.129 (talk) 06:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to update the page that the candidate lost in the election. Can you clarify what I am doing wrong here?

Hello,

I have found a mistake in translation in the page for the National Technical University of Athens. I tried changing it but you reversed my changes twice. Can I pass the change over to you?

Thank you,

143.167.149.89 (talk) 09:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC) Panagiotis[reply]

I did not log in to my account and was instead given an IP address which stated I had made several changes to Wikipedia articles which I had definately not. However I have made a change to the Marjorie Yates article which was simply correcting a expired IMDB link. However you have changed it, and reverted it back to the expired link?? I don't know why! Anyway you obviously must know best so I'm leaving it in your capable hands to correct this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisjayhaych (talk • contribs) 09:38, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello again,

Interesting. I checked the University's web page after your message and indeed they have -wrongly- translated it as "Royal School of Arts" there. This is a typical confusion among native Greeks with moderate English skills, because the greek word "τέχνη" applies both to "craft" and "art".

In Greek, in order to differentiate between the two the term "καλές τέχνες" ("good arts") is used for the Arts (leading to the French "Beaux-Arts" and the English "Fine Arts", an obvious redundancy in these languages). The english wikipedia entry for this also states "Techne, or techné, as distinguished from episteme, is etymologically derived from the Greek word τέχνη (Ancient Greek: IPA: [tékʰnεː], Modern Greek Ell-Techni.ogg [ˈtexni] (help·info)) which is often translated as craftsmanship, craft, or art."

[[4]]

In this case is obvious that the term is the Royal School of Crafts as "It was then named the "Royal School of Arts", a part-time vocational school (Sundays and Holidays only) with the purpose of training craftsmen, builders and master craftsmen."

In any case, I see why you would want to keep the Royal School of Arts, as my alma matter has it like this in its website. I will try contacting them, though one usually does not have much luck with Greek public servants.

I apologize for any inconvenience, I did not mean to cause any problems -I am fairly aware of the difference between Arts and Crafts actually :)

Kind Regards

143.167.149.89 (talk) 09:52, 8 June 2009 (UTC) Panagiotis[reply]

sorry

ok i am sorry ps i LOVE Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.27.64.193 (talk) 00:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

perry wu

Hello, I just would like to remove this entry. I created it and don't want to maintain it any more. I don't know how to do that. It is inaccurate now.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newtonke (talk • contribs) 00:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

perry wu 2

Oh and

Perry has been involved in the creation of programmable logic, online services, Internet access, multiplayer games, VOIP, and most recently programmable packet inspection. Amongst others, Perry has been involved in the creation of Xilinx, Mpath, eWorld, Sitesmith, Alibris, and more recently, Cloudshield, Enkata, Persist, and WireCache. He has been an investment professional at Accel Partners, Bedrock Capital, and most recently as a General Partner at ComVentures. Earlier in his career as an entrepreneur, he helped start Mpath, the first peer-to-peer multiplayer game service and VoIP service, and managed its growth from inception to IPO. He was an early pioneer in the Internet at eWorld, where he helped plan the spinout of Apple's Internet and EDI Services business. Previous to that, Perry was part of the startup team at Xilinx where he helped spur the adoption of field programmable gate arrays. Perry has also served in technical roles at IBM's Almaden Research Center and Andersen Consulting.

turned out to be marketing hype, and is unverifiable... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newtonke (talk • contribs) 00:33, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

perry wu 3

OK, so blank it again and then let you know? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newtonke (talk • contribs) 00:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Question: I don't understand why this change was reverted, because I included a change comment (so I didn't remove content without explanation, as you said in my talk page). Did I miss anything else, or was it a faulty bot? --134.100.12.124 (talk) 15:21, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again. Thanks for the explanation. Just to let you know that I did not add any links, I just removed a misleading piece of text next to a link. But it doesn't really matter anymore because the page has changed a lot. --134.100.12.124 (talk) 13:48, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Sorry for the change , I will make the neccesary changes that are constructive rather than funny for funny sake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by T J Haigh (talk • contribs) 16:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Riff Raff

I reverted edit you made because the only substantial author of the article has the right to blank the page, after which it is eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G7. Best regards, Kotiwalo (talk) 13:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just noticed Microlise's original author actually saying that they want their article deleted and the edit was reverted - please, Chrisch, not all blankings are vandalism. Huggle can mark it G7 from the tools menu (IIRC) to help you even further. -- Menti fisto 14:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

^ "National Ground Intelligence Center Report on the Recovery of Chemical Munitions in Iraq" (PDF). United States Congress. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessdaymonth= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)