User talk:Chris Welsby

Welcome!

Hello, Chris Welsby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 21:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because the username, Chris Welsby, matches the name of a well-known, living person.

If you are the person represented by this username, please note that the practice of blocking such usernames is to protect you from being impersonated, not to discourage you from editing Wikipedia. You may choose to edit under a new username (see information below), but keep in mind that you are welcome to continue to edit under this username. If you choose to do so, we ask the following:

Please be willing and able to prove your identity to Wikipedia.
Please send an e-mail to info-enwikimedia.org. Be aware that the volunteer response team that handles e-mail is indeed operated entirely by volunteers, and the reply may not be immediate.

If you are not the person represented by this username, you are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Please see here. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved via OTRS. See user page. Huon (talk) 00:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome again

I am so sorry I had to block your account earlier. Again, it was to protect you from being impersonated. Now, down to the matter at hand: Please feel free to edit the article. Here are some important things to read about: Dear Anna,

I am surprised that you say to go ahead and edit the article, Your own Wiki guidelines indicate that no one should edit material pertaining to themselves. Also  I have read the notes on COI. This sounds like a good idea to me but I have no interest in selling or promotion. of the Welsby Wikipedia site.   I am glad to  that she is no longer so cold!   Surely promotion and advertising is surely not the only motivator? EG I  have an interest in making sure that any page with my name on it  is accurate and that it represents  my art and my life. At the moment my Wiki page  is full of errors and the included material is simply not  relevant.  The page  has clearly been assembled by people who do not know the field.  We may be about to se a flowering of new information.  That may be but I belong to the arts community and no one can afford to work for nothing. Academics are employed and paid by their university  to do their research. If they are editing wiki sites they are being paid to do so. Surely it is nieve to think that anyone can be without conflict of influence?

So here is the problem: I don't care about promotion or advertising. I have enough to do as it is! However I have spent my whole life making the artworks that are the basis of my carreer and I care very much that they are well presented . Not, necessarily the way I see my art practice but at least something that anyone who knows the field at all would recognise and understand. How can this be achieved? I should add that my conflict is not based on vanity. I really don't care whether or not I come accross as a smart person or a fool but I take my work seriously and I do not want to stand by and see it represented in a uncaring, shoddy and inaccurate way..

I understand that there is no single authoritative history of anything but I also realise that it is difficult to describe anything by consensus . My life story is important to me and I

look foreword to hearing from you shortly.

Many thanks,

Chris Chris Welsby (talk) 08:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
Peacock and weasel words
Reliable sources
Original research

If you need anything, please ask. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:01, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anna,

My apologies for the critical tone. Thank you for the helpful information. I am somewhat the wiser for this experience. I realize there is little that you can do to help. Thank you for being kind enough to respond to my complaint.

Best wishes, Chris Welsby (talk) 21:54, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]