User talk:Chris Warburton Brown

Welcome!

Hello, Chris Warburton Brown, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 15:56, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

William Newton (architect)

I would like to suggest this page is renamed William Newton (architect 1730-1798, Newcastle) to distinguish it more clearly from the page Wiliam Newton (architect 1735-1790, London), as this understandably seems to be causing confusion, especially with attribution of works.

I have added a lot of new content; some biographical and stylistic info, and a lot of attributed and potentially attributed buildings. This was my first experience of editing a Wikipedia page, and I made many of my early changes using 'minor change' at first, which I then couldn't remove, so sorry about that. I'm not sure about correct referencing, I'm used to Harvard but that doesn't seem common here, any suggestions for a useful guide/page? Chris Warburton Brown (talk) 17:05, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This suggestion you should better post on the article's talkpage (The link next to Article above the main text). For images, please note that it's not possible to use images hosted elsewhere on the web because most of them are copyrighted and the Wikimedia Foundation staff doesn't want to answer takedown requests all the day. For the core questions, please read WP:Uploading images and Wikipedia:Picture tutorial. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 18:32, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We do use Harvard for the academics. When you put in a reference you can put |ref=harv.--Biografer (talk) 15:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestions and tips. Jannik Schwaß (talk I tried using the talk page but it just gave me this message, with no option to add content: 'This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.'

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

So, I created my first draft page following the instructions provided. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:David_Stephenson_(architect) It's finished and ready to move from 'draft' to 'live'. Now what happens? I guess somebody needs to sign it off? But who, how and when? Thanks! Chris Please help me with...

Chris Warburton Brown (talk) 13:12, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris Warburton Brown, thank you very much for your submission. I have now submitted the article for review; this may take about two months. Feel free to edit the article at any time if there's something you would like to change.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:20, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Stephenson (architect) has been accepted

David Stephenson (architect), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lopifalko (talk) 13:47, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

David Stephenson

Thank you for your good work on David Stephenson. I hope that you don't let the pettifogging (both on the article's talk page and [via templates] within the article itself) get you down. Some editors tend to work like that, and with the best of intentions. (At times, I'm one of them.)

And now ... allow me to pettifog for a moment. You write for example:

The Buildings of England: Northumberland. (1992) Grundy, J., McCombie, G., Ryder, P., Welfare, H. & Pevsner, N., Penguin Books

There are of course various ways of presenting this kind of information, but yours is unfamiliar to me -- in particular, having authors' names follow the title. One of several far more familiar orders would be

Grundy, J., McCombie, G., Ryder, P., Welfare, H. and Pevsner, N. (1992) Northumberland. 2nd ed. The Buildings of England. Harmondsworth, Middx: Penguin.

but perhaps things are different when writing about architecture. -- Hoary (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're 100% correct. I always use Harvard. No idea what happened here, I must have had a brain fart. I am actually really impressed with wikipedia's editing support, and strict content rules, so far. So please petifog away all you like!

Chris Warburton Brown (talk) 12:36, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused about page referencing. One of the editors has requested page refs, though that doesn't seem to be on other wiki pages. I can include them, with a bit of faff, but how? If I add them it will tell me that the multiple references no longer match. I didn't create the multiple refs, that was another editor, and I don't really understand how they work. In Harvard you should put the page in the brackets e.g. (Hoary 2019, 6) but that doesn't work here. Advice please.

Please see what I wrote yesterday (or thereabouts) within Talk:David Stephenson (architect) about the "rp" template. -- Hoary (talk) 21:42, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]