User talk:Chris Roe234

Welcome!

Hello, Chris Roe234! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 20:26, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

October 2018

Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, United States presidential election, 2016‎‎, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 20:27, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at United States presidential election, 2016. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Discuss on talk page, provide references, & do not remove cited material. Peaceray (talk) 20:37, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Roe234, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Chris Roe234! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Hello, Chris Roe234! Just to let you know that your edits to the page United States presidential election, 2016 were unconstructive and violated Wikipedia's policy that information added must be supported by a Reliable Source. Your edits have been reverted. Please do not make this kind of claim without providing support to show that it is true. Thank you. --MelanieN (talk) 23:37, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ku Klux Klan page

According to the Ku Klux Klan page, you're an editor that has access to the editorially-locked page, so I decided it was best to contact you. If you have no way of actually editing the page and i just misread, then void this message.

If you do have access however, I seem to have found an error. After reading the entire page, top to bottom, I don't understand how the Ku Klux Klan can be considered "far-right", as specified by the "political party" sublink. I ask that if this can be changed, it be corrected to say "Democratic Party" as that is the real and often addressed party, affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan. Thank you for you time.  DankCactus (talk) 10:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Gender pay gap, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. —DIYeditor (talk) 20:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Ku Klux Klan. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Previous warnings in October. User just doesn't seem to get how Wikipedia works. —DIYeditor (talk) 20:57, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deceptive edit summary

Chris, do not make deceptive edit summaries as you did here. If I see that again, I intend to take appropriate action in accordance with Wikipedia policy and guidelines. Neutrality^talk 22:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Signing Talk page comments

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.--Quisqualis (talk) 03:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gender pay gap edit

I notice that you were reverted in your recent edit. You failed to cite reliable sources. You do quite a good job of feigning near-idiocy, but your intent at Wikipedia appears to be anything other than making an encyclopedia, based on the totality of your edits these past three months. Is your intent to waste our time? You succeeded.--Quisqualis (talk) 08:21, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Chris Roe234! You created a thread called Why aren't Conservatives sources concidered "unreliable"? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert climate change

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alert US politics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:32, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DS Alerts.... and Truth

The two DS alerts I gave you today are FYI in nature. Please review our policies on WP:Neutrality and what Wikipedia defines as a reliable source. Also I noticed your user page says you want to provide readers with "the Truth". In that case, you might do better to start your own blog, because Wikipedia is not about truth, but about verification. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recommendation: Sign your posts, please

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. If you must post idiocy, then kindly sign it.--Quisqualis (talk) 04:32, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]