If you want to discuss a particular edit I made, please do so on the relevant discussion page

Welcome!

Hello, Chris Pickett, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Mike42 00:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Differences

Well, let me start by saying that I hate to write this since I am not one of those guys that stand up again if someone destroys their work for no apparant reason. Nevertheless I will try.
I am sorry I can not write on the discussion page of the article in question instead of here about your edit . You made a proposal to delete List of commercial Linux games and categorize it instead. As I learned, it seems you meant to integrate the listed games in the Category:Linux games instead. Well, how should I say this..? I know you develop on Java but that should not refrain you from understanding that Linux games and commercial Linux games are not the same. If you need an example to understand this: On The Linux Game Tome are over 2000 entries but only about 150 of those are commercial games. -- Darklock 13:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I proposed deletion of all three of those lists because they were not being maintained properly and because Wikipedia is not a repository of lists, particularly lists of articles that do not exist. I did follow the proper process, the deletion was uncontested for five days, and an admin deleted it, not me. Go ahead and create a "commercial Linux games" category if you like and tag all articles about commercial games. I've stopped editing Wikipedia but saw this old note and thought it would be polite to reply to you. Chris Pickett 11:05, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Linux

Hey, saw you changed my parenthetical thing back to your approach. Let's talk about it on Talk:Linux; look for a section titled "Outcome by Warrens". Thanks. -/- Warren 23:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Hey Chris, I just think that you seriously deserve one of those for your contributions to the Linux article. I knew that someone would come and do the improvements that needed to be done, but you went above and beyond my expectations. Thanks for everything. Now unfortunately comes the difficult task of citing all this info... :) Freedom to share 17:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks, that was a nice surprise. I basically decided to pick an article and focus on it a little bit each day until it reaches FA status. We'll see if Linux gets there, there's a lot left to do! Cheers, Chris Pickett 19:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We just have to add citations to everything that was added during this huge revision, then a mass delete of all info that is not useful (25% - 40%) and we are there, at FP status. That was not just a small contribution, but a huge edit. Thanks for your help, Freedom to share 21:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of Linux distributions#File system support draft

I'm sorry if I messed up your ordering. Anyway, I'd like your thoughts on this. Do you think that's an appropriate way to display the information? Is there anything that I should add,remove,or rearrange? Mike92591 23:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems fine, but I don't think you want an "others" column. I'm not really sure the table is even really that important---isn't file system support mainly handled by the kernel? The difference seems to be a question of whether the distro enabled support for it directly, which is pretty minor. But maybe I'm missing something... Chris Pickett 23:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was skeptical myself of it's usefulness but, I'll just keep it there if someone thinks otherwise. Thanks for the feedback. Mike92591 00:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Linux (again)

Hi, Chris. I think that a little more work on Linux would bring it to Featured Article status. I would grateful for your comments here. Thanks. Axl 12:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to discuss a particular edit I made, please do so on the relevant discussion page

Windows (disambiguation)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Windows (disambiguation), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Elassint ^{Hi! ^_^} 16:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Speculative multithreading

The article Speculative multithreading has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Draftify:This seems to be a loose collection of references and no real article body. I can't see any way that something can possibly be parallelised by a thread but not instructions. It appears to be describing a virtual machine that makes determinations about thread execution order without programmer intervention in a manner that cannot be done ahead of time. If an the claim is that an AoT algorithm may be unable to auto-vectorize a process because of unresolved variables, such as indexes into an array in a for loop. But that being the case, it would still be an AoT algorithm on the for loop with just a lazy evaluation. I'm not even certain that would be possible without a perfect oracle. I think it might have merit but in its current state it looks too suspect to be in the main article space.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ethanpet113 (talk) 08:27, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of IBM Centers for Advanced Studies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IBM Centers for Advanced Studies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:33, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of IBM Centers for Advanced Studies

The article IBM Centers for Advanced Studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of passing WP:GNG/WP:NCOMPANY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:30, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]