User talk:ChrisJBenson

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, ChrisJBenson! I am LouriePieterse and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Lourie Pieterse 08:28, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia "oldest legislature" edits

The changes themselves were fine, but they absolutely should not have been tagged as minor edits, especially not the one at Virginia General Assembly, where you deleted some references. In general, minor edits should be confined to fixing typos, adding links, or simply rearranging text. You may want to review WP:MINOR some time. Rklear (talk) 17:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shires of Virginia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

by the 1870 Constitution, an area can be in a city or in a county, but cannot be in ''both'').

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed: 10 June 2013 by User:ChrisJBenson (talk)

Accomac Shire

Hello, ChrisJBenson. You have new messages at Rklear's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Rklear (talk) 12:38, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Henry Dudeney may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

puzzle. For another example of Loyd's pervasive deceit, see [[Fifteen_puzzle#Sam_Loyd|15 puzzle]]). Dudeney experienced Loyd's duplicity and [[Sui_generis#Intellectual_property_law|intellectual

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:43, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed: 30 July 2013 ChrisJBenson (talk) 18:54, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great suggestions. And of course feel free to add more country specific details to the subpage. Thanks again Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 09:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting support for a specific case where article may have misunderstood its source

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am unsure of an edit I am proposing for the article on Ian Walker (footballer) (a living person). Briefly, I think the article misunderstood the cited reference and am seeking a vote of confidence or veto for that from another editor, before making the change. I have outlined my concern and proposed change on the target article's talk page here: Talk:Ian Walker (footballer)#Cited source may have been misunderstood Furthermore, I don't even know if this is an accepted or acceptable use of the help-me template. So I'm in bad shape all around today, it seems. My lack of confidence is partly because this article is about a living person. Many thanks in advance from ChrisJBenson (talk) 13:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold, ChrisJBenson, and make the edit! The worst that can happen is that another contributor might disagree and revert your edit. At that point a good discussion [there] on the talk page will smooth the improvement if necessary. (copied from talk page) – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 13:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am on my bold way now ... ChrisJBenson (talk) 13:23, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request editor with rollback privileges for article affcted by current events

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am seeking the brief assistance of an editor who has Edit Rollback authorization.
I am not requesting this authorization for me.
An article related to current breaking news (not yet broken!) has been repeatedly vandalized in the last few hours.
The sequence of vandalism is well-suited to be reverted by just two rollbacks.

The vandalism target is World football transfer record. This is currently a high profile article that will be highly important to some over the next couple of days. It suffered twelve vandalism edits in a one hour period overnight. These acts are consecutive edits by just two editors (obviously same person - see (a)), so the rollback procedure would work well and leave a clearer record.

Nearly all of these edits can be easily identified as vandalism by the following:

(a) The cited source is identical and wrong in each case. The source is a BBC article published on 9 June 2009. The source was apparently retrieved on 9 June 2009 in all cases, though not used until today!. The BBC article is about Kaka, a valid 2009 entry that has been correctly listed here for years.

(b) The added vandalism entries are dated with the year 2013 (and one 2011), making them clearly out of chronological order. The last two valid entries were Kaka, then Christian Ronaldo in 2009, although a new entry will be added in the next 48 hours for Gareth Bale. The very last of these vandalism edits is the premature addition of Gareth Bale. It looks like the same vandal though, because the same 9 June 2009 BBC article is cited.

The vandalism seems to have abated. There were a small number of other vandalism edits in the last two days, but these have already been individually reverted.

The latest in twelve consecutive vandalism edits is: 570119902 at 5:22 25 August 2013
The earliest of the twelve vandalism edits is 570114635 at 4:27 25 August 2013
The last good edit before them was 569976671 at 3:23 24 August 2013 by Bladeboy1889.

With thanks, from ChrisJBenson (talk) 14:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can request the page is protected at WP:RFPP. Mdann52 (talk) 14:36, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Bowring may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

]. On 27 April 1847 he addressed the [[House of Commons]] on the merits of decimalisation.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article37127716 |title=ENGLISH NEWS, Parliamentary

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:02, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of edit to Great Storm of 1987

Hi there, I reverted your edit to Great Storm of 1987 as I think you read Return period of the winds as representing the average reoccurrence time of the storm, which is I think precicely the cause of the "Myth" about the context of the storm, and has been perpetuated ever since. Have a read of the Return period article, and if you still feel the distinction is imaginary, please feel free to contact me or discuss with me at the talk page of the article, and we'll see what kind of consensus we can come up with.Lacunae (talk) 16:41, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Tesla Roadster for you!

	A Tesla Roadster for you!
	Thank you for editing Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 13:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Tesla Roadster for you!

	A Tesla Roadster for you!
	Thank you for editing Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 13:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ORCID

Please add {{Authority control|ORCID=XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX}} to your user page, replacing XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX with your ORCID identifier. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:10, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I hope the Wiki-police didn't rough up the suggester Andy Mabbett in the process, though. ChrisJBenson (talk) 01:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. One gets used to the inanity... ;-) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Martinez (Amtrak station) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

200 from the station to the Veterans, Kaiser, and County Hospitals in Martinez and then to the [[Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station], where other Tri-Delta buses offer service to Eastern Contra

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:19, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martinez (Amtrak station), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Joaquin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Sherlock (TV series): Special (2016)

Hello, ChrisJBenson. You have new messages at AlexTheWhovian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

but be gentle. I am well aware of what else the Sherlock writers write. ChrisJBenson (talk) 12:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saint David's Day

Good morning Chris,
Thank you for your revision earlier this morning. A great improvement and I do hope you approve of my editing there following yours.
Henry Tudor, 2nd Earl of Richmond, who was born in Pembroke Castle and a patrilineal descendant of the Tudor Dynasty of North Wales, became King Henry VII of England after his ...
Cheers from Wales! — Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh | Buzzard | 09:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ChrisJBenson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ChrisJBenson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ping

I responded on User talk:Quuxplusone#Teredo_and_Teredo_Navalis. :) --Quuxplusone (talk) 17:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And one more time: User talk:Quuxplusone#teredo --Quuxplusone (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ChrisJBenson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]