User talk:Chris-marsh-usa
|
Cornell Rockey 20:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
John Gillespie McGee edits
[edit]Hi, I guess you're new to Wikipedia. You don't need to add the four tildes (~ x4) to the edit text you add to an article: this makes your name appear in the text of the article. Your name and the time is automatically recorded in the edit history of the page (see the history' tab at the top of the page). I've removed the two occurrences of your name from the article, and also some of the information about the TV idents - it is not relevant to John Gillespie McGee whether these were produced in association with the US Government! Remember the article should just contain material that directly relates to him and his work. But otherwise - thansk for your contributions. 86.134.30.186 07:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
American biased edits
[edit]Hi Chris, I reverted your religious edits and insertion of biblical passages to the Microchip implant (human) article. Please stop adding this material to that article as it is most inappropriate as it represents unsourced original research. I also had a quick look at your other edits and they left me rather concerned that you have a mistaken understanding of the purpose of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an international project to build a neutral, sourced, international encyclopedia. Your contributions should be sourced to reliable sources such as newspaper and journal articles, books, etc. We don't accept editorial comments, opinions or original research (so your edits should not be written from an "us", "we", "our" perspective) and contributions need to be written from a neutral point of view. Adding "Eventually our adversaries picked up on this technology" to the History of the Internet article is not acceptable as it is dripping with point of view and opinion - there's no "we" here, this is not an American point of view encyclopedia but one written for and by people all over the world. Similarly your edit to ARPANET spoke of "the same technology we used". I can see that you have good intentions here, though, and you're most welcome to join us in building this encyclopedia but please be careful that your edits comply with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, which you will find linked to in the welcome message at the top of this page. Most importantly, please be careful to ensure your edits are of a neutral point of view and not American-centric and that they are sourced to reliable, published and verifiable sources. Regards, Sarah 03:15, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
I ought to know better. Studied sociology and here I am being ethnocentric.
Microchip implant
[edit]As Sarah told you, Wikipedia articles must be based on published sources, not your own ideas. I need to warn you at this point that if you continue to insert this material without being able to give sources for it, I will have to ask for your account to be blocked. Looie496 (talk) 04:25, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Your brain is moving faster than mine.Chris-marsh-usa (talk) 04:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC) The human microchip implant looks like a mark. If I was looking at it I would think it was a mark. I would call it a mark.
The photograph shows it looking like a mark. If indeed (as we believe) Apostle John of Patmos did see one across time it probably looked like "a mark".Chris-marsh-usa (talk) 04:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
At least I know how to use Wikipedia talk page now and read my mail.Chris-marsh-usa (talk) 04:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing the material. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 04:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Could somebody substantiate that a (human) microchip implant is always visible to the naked eye? That would then reduce the issue to a matter of religious belief to what a historical figure named John the Apostle is believed by modern people to have seen regarding the 21st Century.
At least in animals, it is completely invisible, but my cat was also covered in fur.
Mark or no mark, the content about concerns from the religious community would be appropriate content for the article because for some in the Christian community, the concern is real. However, that content must be sufficiently sourced and cited. In other words, you must cite previously published commentary about the religious concerns of RFID. Such citations could be books or other publications like this or this. It is becoming an increasingly controversial issue, and should be included in the article. In fact, these concerns may have been the impetus for several states having enacted laws banning forced RfD implantation. See WP:CIT for information on how to properly cite this idea. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.212.177.10 (talk) 01:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Heroes of Desert Storm
[edit]The plot could be greatly simplified: The events of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, deployment in Saudi Arabia, and complete war are told from several perspectives: the Kuwaiti people, U.S. Army and Marines, Navy pilots and sailors, Air Force pilots and crew, an Army Reserve unit, an Army chaplain on the Basra-Kuwait Highway, American and Iraqi prisoners of war, and American families back home. Though it was easy to get carried away with the thrill of the movie if anyone else has seen it, I wonder if you have.
I cannot substantiate that the movie seemed oversimplified for the American civilian audience so that gets left out of course.
The characters could probably be left in.Chris-marsh-usa (talk) 02:51, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Kratos
[edit]I saw that Operation Kratos is an anti-terrorist policy. Intriguing because I work for the San Diego-based company Kratos Defense and Security Solutions (Arlington VA office). I think a disambiguation page.... does it have to point to a Wikipedia page immediately? I do think it is a shame that one definition for Kratos is missing.Chris-marsh-usa (talk) 15:08, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Subdivisions (song)
[edit]Seeking permission to add external link
[edit]I think this external link from Nerds adds to Subdivisions (song). Paul Graham basically describes suburbia and its schools basically good for raising kids. As schools do not teach, a counterculture of self-absorbed conformists emerges and punishes, for example, committed students who "don't get it" that they are in a game where everybody wins/graduates.
And maybe for what I know, the real winners in life are the people pleasers. I experienced no environment such as I expected, no murderous academic environment comparable to combat where you could see your classmate fall "dead". I never saw casualties taken wherever I went to school....
- "Why Nerds are Unpopular", an essay by Paul Graham about the conformist society in American high schools.Chris-marsh-usa (talk) 23:17, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
What's wrong with lyrics as references anyway?
[edit]Was anything wrong with the referenced quotes from the hyrics??Chris-marsh-usa (talk) 23:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello - You, or someone with your username, has voted in the Global Sysops Vote but you don't have a Unified Login (SUL account). Please could you:
- merge your accounts
- or add a link from your Meta user page to your local user page.
This is necessary to confirm your identity or your vote may not be counted. Thank you --(RT) (talk) 12:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
September 2011
[edit]
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. There is no need to sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Jac16888 Talk 11:22, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Your article has been moved to AfC space
[edit]Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Chris-marsh-usa/Donald Ryles has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Donald Ryles, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 03:28, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
{{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mangoe (talk) 03:52, 1 November 2011 (UTC)Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Donald Ryles, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Donald Ryles
[edit]
Hello Chris-marsh-usa. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Donald Ryles.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Donald Ryles}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 17:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Your edits
[edit]Please don't use misleading edit summaries ("Fixed typo" when you clearly do not). Use reliable sources with your additions, youtube links are usually not. Materialscientist (talk) 07:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
July 2016
[edit]
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. McSly (talk) 01:01, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Chris-marsh-usa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
December 2016
[edit]
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to WarGames. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. The Old JacobiteThe '45 03:05, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Chris-marsh-usa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Chris-marsh-usa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of The Heroes of Desert Storm for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Heroes of Desert Storm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Down to a Sunless Sea (Graham novel) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Down to a Sunless Sea (Graham novel), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Down to a Sunless Sea (Graham novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 July 2024 (UTC)