User talk:Chozen1

RE:WHOA

No, Chad and Tatsuki hook up to give birth to the strongest set of human children ever. Duh.

More seriously though, you're incorrect because arrancar and vizard are two fundamentally different methods of giving a soul both shinigami and hollow traits, and you can't be both. Further, since all arrancar, all vizards, all shinigami, and all Quincy are human souls, you can't be a human hybrid. Let me explain.

A vizard is a soul that is both shinigami and hollow, not merged but rather in a symbiotic relationship. They can take on full shinigami, full hollow, and partially converted bodies as a reflection of which spirit is dominant.

An arrancar is a soul that is both shinigami and hollow, but merged together. They break down the wall between shinigami and hollow, with the result of a single spirit that is both.

So no, Ichigo is not a human/shinigami because all souls are human by default. He is further not an arrancar/vizard because he has an inner hollow rather than being melded together with the "other side" of his soul. The two special traits he does possess are being born of shinigami lineage (this apparently makes super-strong souls to start with, hence the status of the noble houses), and being a vizard.

So hopefully that answers your question. --tjstrf talk 06:23, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deidara article

No I am not an admin just been here on Wiki for about 10 months now I guess you can say I'm pretty good not as good as some here though.Sam ov the blue sand 16:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats

Congragulations on graduating!

Fair use rationale for Image:KuroroLucifer.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:KuroroLucifer.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 16:02, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have taken a look at the image and provided a fairly standard fair use rationale for an image like this. You can see it here. Note that a Fair use rationale has little to do with the image itself. It describes the USAGE of the image in the article. It needs to explain why you can use the copyrighted image in Wikipedia. Basically, you are using something that is not yours without giving money to the one who made it and without their permission, and that can only be done under very specific conditions, which others need to be able verify to be reasonable. That is why it is quite difficult to properly add such an image to an article. For instance in your attempt to write a fair use rationale, you stated the following "Totally free, screenshot taken off of a fan-made YouTube video. Not an entire episode. All rights to creator Yoshihiro Togashi of course." That is plain wrong. Even if you do not pay for something, it does not mean it is free, you cannot simply do anything you want with it. This is the difference between gratis and freedom. This image is copyrighted by the person who invented this character and shaped it's basic looks. That means both the writer of the story as well as the person who actually drew the image. Then the image was made into a video anime series. The people who did this also have some rights. Then a fan took pieces of the anime and compiled a "fanvideo". The fanvideo itself is also an artistic work of which the author has some rights. You see that is totally unequal to something being free. The copyright in this case lies mostly with the company that produced the anime. It is quite complicated. You can read more about Wikipedias policies on these issue at these links: Wikipedia:Non-free_content and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, glad to be of assistance. And no, i'm not an admin, just a user helping another user :D --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kuroro.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kuroro.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:KuroroLucifer.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:KuroroLucifer.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KuroroDanshou.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KuroroDanshou.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:33, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]