User talk:Cholmes75/Archive/Archive-Mar2007
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 10 | 5 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Deleted article review
[edit]- Question, I was looking up an article that I had worked on but it had been deleted. When I checked the deletion log, it said that it had been removed b/c of "expired prod, also non-notable". While the non-notable is debatable, what does expired prod mean? Shirley Ku 20:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Is there any way to reinstate that article? B/c I know understand the expired prod but I don't think that the subject is non-notable. Shirley Ku 20:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- The name of the article was "Mark Masterson". He's the writer of a comic book called Dorothy.Shirley Ku 03:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Are there any guidelines for what constitutes a notable person? I tried looking for one but didn't find any. B/c being notable isn't cut and dry. I'll look at the undeleting review process too.
Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 11 | 12 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:12, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Please review my post.
[edit]Hey Cholmes75,
You were helping me create an article back in November for Sportsvite. The site has grown since then and I have tried to create a new and accurate article on my temp page. Can you please give it a look and let me know how I can improve before I make it live.
--Sportslit 06:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Looks OK to me, but don't be surprised if someone else thinks it's spam. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 13:22, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Steve Hackett/tapping
[edit]The cited article says that Hackett "learned" tapping in 1971 -- that's not the same as saying he was one of the first guitarists to do it. Check out the separate article on tapping, it mentions a number of guitarists -- like Emmett Chapman, Harry DeArmond, Jimmie Webster, etc. -- all of whom used the technique at least a decade before Hackett did.
Many Hackett fans have tried to discredit Eddie Van Halen with inventing tapping. While this may be true, to give full credit to Hackett is just as wrong. Jphillst 15:46, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Oakland Raiders FAC
[edit]I see the Raiders FAC wasn't promoted, that's unfortunate because it looks like it was mostly due to not getting enough responses. I was busy with the Michael Jordan FAC, but since I'm a football fan if you send me a message next time it's up for FA I'll be sure to review it. Hopefully next time enough people will review it, because it's a shame to see an FAC fail due mainly to the fact that nobody reviewed it. Quadzilla99 16:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
article
[edit]why was the article i made deleted??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kavster (talk • contribs) 17:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC).
- Which one? --cholmes75 (chit chat) 19:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)