User talk:Choi1979

Choi1979, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Choi1979! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Your recent editing history at Alexander Bogdanov shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. RolandR (talk) 17:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of encyclopedia content with no explanation; potential vandalism

For the second time now I've noted, and reversed, this edit to Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, the second now from User:Choi1979. First was from an IP#. I'm not acting on the content of the edits but the fact that they are unexplained. I hope you will reconsider this form of editing as it can appear to be Wikipedia:Vandalism. There is an "Edit summary" space below the edit area to give such an explanation for each edit. In addition, I'd recommend creating a user page (just click on the red name) but that's personal preference of mine. Thanks. Swliv (talk) 16:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 20:08, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]