User talk:Chogglershouseparty

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Noamshouseparty (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Speedy deletion of "Noamshouseparty"

A page you created, Noamshouseparty, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:14, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create pages with false or misleading information. There is no state within the United States as you have indicated. Continued editing in this fashion will lead to you being blocked from editing. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 19:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whadya mean, Doctor? Sure amn't I only doin what the missus told me? She's Merican herself you see! Told me of the Hills of Getseminey! I want to create so many WIKYPEDIA pages to help all the way gooder information get out there! Thanks for Your time! Chogglershouseparty (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not contact me again. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 03:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not contact me again! DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 02:09, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad

with this:

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

PS. You can sign your talk page posts with four ~'s. Dloh cierekim 19:50, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Start small and work up-- find ways to improve articles in small ways-- copy edit (you need to get a spellchecker, fast), add sources, add material that you have found WP:rs on.
Look at the links in the welcome I left you-- you need to understand the guidleines.
Do not start a new article unless you have verifiable information, from relaibel sources.
If you have access to a university or high quality public library, look through their holdings and see if you can find new info on existing article or begin a new article.
Review our policies and guidelines carefully.
Stay positive and be polite. You may want to curb some of your exuberance. Dloh cierekim 20:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your cousin

was blocked for disruption. I would not continue to bring him up. You must take care lest you share his fate. Dloh cierekim 20:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to User talk:Delicious carbuncle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Vishnava_talk 20:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Alex Ferguson. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rlendog (talk) 21:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

taken as a whole are getting pretty disruptive, don't you think? And continuing to post to another user's talk page after he asked you not to is just one example. Food for thought, eh? Cheers, Dloh cierekim 19:18, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Noamshouseparty

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Noamshouseparty, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rosiestep (talk) 19:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

like this will not be tolerated. If it continues, you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Dloh cierekim 20:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sincerity

You come across as one with little sincerity. If you truly desire my help, you will need to earn it with a demonstration of your accountability and reliability in terms of article editing. Today is October 8 -- if you can begin contributing to Wikipedia in a constructive and pleasant manner and sustain for 2 weeks (on or about October 26th), I will take that as a sign of your remorse and change of direction and agree to help you. If you receive any warnings whatsoever, I shall not.

Do not use inappropriate language.
Do not make disruptive edits.
Do not antagonize other editors.
Do not engage in any edit wars, whatsoever.
Do not create ridiculous articles that objectively possess no merit.
Do not act in a fashion that belittles your alleged premise for being a member of the Wikipedia community: to contribute to the project in a positive fashion.

Let your actions speak louder than your words -- editing is a privilege that can and will be taken away if you do not discontinue the path you are traveling. You may contact me on the 26th, at which time I will review your progress and decide whether or not you are worthy of assistance, or are just another wild vandal who deserves to be blocked indefinitely. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 20:43, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Alexf^(talk) 00:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chogglershouseparty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was bein' antagonised by other people who disrupted my efforts to edit Sir Aec Ferguson's page in a constructive manner! I thought I was supposed to hav two weeks to prove I am good at editing! Look at the above message! I have'nt been even given a chance here! I can't even defend myself if I get blocked! Please rethink this decision boss! I'll do a good job! OK?

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but if you genuinely believe that this is a constructive edit, I'm afraid that your constructive efforts are indistinguishable from vandalism. Unfortunately, since it seems that you are not able to edit Wikipedia in a way that makes the encyclopedia better, we'll have to say goodbye to you. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.