User talk:ChocolateWolf
Twinkle Help
[edit]Hello, I am having a hard time getting the Twinkle button to show up, I want to add it in, but it refuses! I don't know how I could get it in or anything! I know about My Prefernces but if I add it in and Ctrl , F5 then it doesn't do anything! Can you please help? ChocolateWolf (talk) 03:09, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Hey
[edit]There is some annoying disruptor who keeps deleting a whole page:List of animated feature films:1910s-1950s, and turning it into a redirect, arguing that it "is a direct copy-paste". The fact of the matter is that the page has numerous movies not shown on other lists. When you get the chance, can you please make sure he does not do this again? Perhaps a warning would suffice. Thank you. Shakinglord:Kudos, Mailbox, ??? 21:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
[edit]- Following User:Shakinglord's explanation of the situation, you have been unblocked. Sorry for the inconvienence. - The Bushranger One ping only 18:00, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
You might want to take the time to read the definition of vandalism and also how to read an edit summary and how to use a talk page before you go throwing baseless accusations at established users. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- More specifically, even if it was vandalism (which it wasn't), it's not a good idea to give template messages to experienced editors.Jasper Deng (talk) 21:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, oops, I was having a little advise and my friends told me to revert that because it was content removal. I will be sure to read the guideline now. PS I really like your name Beeblebrox! (HHTTG) ChocolateWolf (talk) 21:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Your friend (and you) should know that not every removal of content is vandalism. If you had read the edit summaries for those edits the reasons would have been clear. Please do be more careful in the future. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, Me and my friend will be sure to do so! Thanks, I am still pretty new at this. ChocolateWolf (talk) 21:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Your friend (and you) should know that not every removal of content is vandalism. If you had read the edit summaries for those edits the reasons would have been clear. Please do be more careful in the future. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry, oops, I was having a little advise and my friends told me to revert that because it was content removal. I will be sure to read the guideline now. PS I really like your name Beeblebrox! (HHTTG) ChocolateWolf (talk) 21:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Borgen
[edit]You made a highly pointless change to Borgen for the worse, do not do it again as it is not helpful. If you did feel there was a reason explain it to me first. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwarPM (talk • contribs) 22:59, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Calabe1992 16:49, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shakinglord for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Calabe1992 17:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
I am not a sock puppet
[edit]I would just like to say, I am not a sock puppet. My brother was the one who made sock puppets, but i am not one of his. I have made my own account, which is this account. I am not a sock puppet and The Bushranger has been told of the situation. Thank you. ChocolateWolf (talk) 21:21, 4 March 2012 (UTC)