User talk:Chocobiscuits

This is Chocobiscuits's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Canelo Álvarez vs. John Ryder has been accepted

Canelo Álvarez vs. John Ryder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 06:56, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Fulton vs. Naoya Inoue (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NEVENT, a case of WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephen Fulton vs. Naoya Inoue and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chocobiscuits! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mauricio Lara vs Leigh Wood II (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NEVENT, a case of WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mauricio Lara vs Leigh Wood II and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Canelo Álvarez vs. Rocky Fielding

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Canelo Álvarez vs. Rocky Fielding, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Canelo Álvarez vs. James Kirkland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canelo Álvarez vs. James Kirkland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canelo Álvarez vs. James Kirkland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 20:18, 3 May 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:40, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How to stop sockpuppeting?

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Any advice on how to quit sockpuppetry? Thanks Chocobiscuits (talk) 17:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The way to quit sockpuppetry is...... to quit sockpuppetry. Stick to a single account, which should be Tbf69. 331dot (talk) 18:10, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot Unblock me there then please. My behaviour has been impeccable on this account. Chocobiscuits (talk) 18:14, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The merits of your edits are not relevant if you are socking. If you want your valid edits to stand, you must make an unblock request under your original account and stop using other accounts(including this one). It's likely going to be a long, hard road to build trust if you really are interested in a return to legitimate editing. If you're not prepared to do that, this is all just a waste of everyone's time, including you. 331dot (talk) 18:17, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I wondered if something was up with this account, knew way too much wiki stuff for a new account. Oaktree b (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My recommendation is the same one I've made to you previously: stop socking immediately, prove you can contribute positively at another Wikimedia project (Commons, Wiktionary, whatever), and post an unblock request on your main account in a year or so to take the WP:Standard offer. The most important part is to stop socking, because if you continue to do so, it would be a miracle if you were ever unblocked; you still have a chance, so don't blow it. Curbon7 (talk) 12:59, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]