User talk:Chivesud

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Analytical Electron Microscope.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! :- ) DCS 01:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LVEM Edits

Hi I would like to talk to you about the recent edits you made to the LVEM page. I do not think there is any other LVEM. introducing a STEM detector into a SEM is not LVEM. While this page is not meant to be an advertisement, the simple fact is that there is no other TEM capable of 5kV operation. Additionally, multiple modes without realignment and a miniature size format are benefits of true LVEM technology and should be included here. If you would take the time to learn about our technology, you may be convinced.

Thanks, jared lap

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Analytical Electron Microscope concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Analytical Electron Microscope, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:20, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Analytical Electron Microscope

Hello Chivesud. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Analytical Electron Microscope.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Analytical Electron Microscope}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 17:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware of the sanctions

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to electronic cigarettes.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

QuackGuru (talk) 03:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Electronic cigarette aerosol

The text is sourced and accurate. See diff. You deleted it twice.[1][2] QuackGuru (talk) 03:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Electronic cigarette

The text is sourced and summarized the body. See diff. Without explanation you deleted sourced text from the lede.[3] QuackGuru (talk) 03:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]