User talk:ChineseNygirl
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hispanics and Latinos in the United States. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is the third time within 36 hours that you have violated this policy. Erikeltic (Talk) 17:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
- As you are now clearly edit warring on a new article, I have blocked your account for a longer period. Please limit yourself to article talk page until you have formed a consensus around your edits. It seems clear that you did not read WP:EW; please do so now. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 18:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
REQUEST UNBLOCK
[edit]
ChineseNygirl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not break the 3 revert rule and was simply restoring data that had been removed by somone who I believe was intentionally committing vandalism, due to the fact they never read any sources i provided from Project MUSE which is an online database of current and back issues of peer-reviewed humanities and social sciences journals. Thank you ChineseNygirl (talk) 19:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Sorry, content disputes are not WP:VANDALISM, and as such are not exempt from edit warring restrictions. You were clearly edit warring; the page history makes it quite obvious. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
O.k thank you for takeing the time to view my request. --ChineseNygirl (talk) 19:41, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
REQUEST UNBLOCK
[edit]ChineseNygirl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not break the 3 revert rule, i put in new data and then restored it TWICE.ChineseNygirl (talk) 19:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per comment below. — Daniel Case (talk) 22:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- No one has claimed you broke 3RR; again, please read WP:EW. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 19:46, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
ChineseNygirl (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I put that data in the white Hispanic page then when it was pointed out to me that my data was about all Hispanics and Latinos of any race, i put the data in a page which i thought would be more appropriate - Hispanics and Latinos in the United States... and it still was removed by somone who clearly from his comments on the Discussion page did not read the citation i had left and he still removed it without any reason and I am the one who gets blocked? Is a comprehensive admixture study of Hispanics in the southwestern U.S (not just California as the person who removed my edits wrongly claimed) and two admixture studies of Hispanics in California (of any race) not of any importance on a page about Hispanics and Latinos in the United states? Can you if not remove the block at least review the data I put on the page - Hispanics and Latinos in the United States....thank you it will be much appreciated......i will take your adivce and read the info you provided thank you. ChineseNygirl (talk) 20:21, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Again, per comment below. I would for this one add a) the point noted in this edit summary, b) WP:NOTTHEM and c) putting up another unblock request while the first was still open, something a lot of admins, myself included, find very annoying. — Daniel Case (talk) 22:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Do you understand at all why you were blocked? It had nothing to do with the content of your edits. --jpgordon::==( o ) 20:35, 22 November 2010 (UTC)