User talk:Chimney Sweepa

The Original Barnstar

	The Original Barnstar
	Excellent work at Anonymous and the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. I wasn't sure if someone would put the effort to update everything that happened since February at this point, but I am glad someone decided to do it. Super Ψ Dro 18:27, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Thank you so much fam! Appreciate it Chimney Sweepa (talk) 21:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

It way to early in the morning for this I apologize. However I feel as though you two can help me with something I have been trying to ... Open , make known, let go, get ride of, uncover... I guess it's all of those things. I just feel like I have maybe told the wrong people and I would like to show the right people. I found this for a reason and had it all these years. This autism in a box and I'm not good with computers or technology or anything really. So if you could reach out to me that would greatly appreciated. Sorry if this is not correct and totally out of place. SMH thanks bye GoldenHoneyBun (talk) 11:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate: FYI. Checkuser? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:05, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know what's going on there. Maybe this is a confused new user? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:29, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

I have no clue what that's all about lol Chimney Sweepa (talk) 02:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate@Deepfriedokra Chimney Sweepa (talk) 02:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Anonymous. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
  • Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. TJRC (talk) 02:14, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the insight Chimney Sweepa (talk) 19:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on AlphaBay. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Throast (talk | contribs) 23:33, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Understood thank you Chimney Sweepa (talk) 01:21, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at AlphaBay, you may be blocked from editing. Clearly not understood, because you continue to engage in the editing war to this day. Refrain from making these edits in the future, otherwise your ability to edit AlphaBay will be blocked. WhichUserAmI? message me 17:05, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Okay and multiple other moderators already came in and said to stop changing it back, and to stop edit warring and it was fine for two weeks before other people started edit warring again. It's also not disruptive since they're the ones switching it back. I told them multiple times as did other users and mods to bring the conversation to the talk page and instead they just keep reverting it. They're the ones switching it to the opposite of what everyone else already agreed on. So bring it to the talk pages. Maybe read the edit history a little better. Chimney Sweepa (talk) 21:36, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Chimney_Sweepa reported by User:Smartse (Result: ). Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 20:09, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. Please note that if you can agree to stop edit-warring on the AlphaBay article, you may be unblocked.

To do this, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Black Kite (talk) 22:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chimney Sweepa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Multiple other people were edit warring and multiple people were in agreement with both them and I, so if this is that serious of an issue then I’ll agree to stop editing the page, as should everyone else. But not here to build an encyclopedia? I created and edited an insane amount of information on other wiki’s. This is the first one where the community heavily clashed and disagreed. So I’ll agree to stop editing if that’s how the admins feel. Chimney Sweepa (talk) 22:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You would need to explain why you're using multiple accounts, such as JimmenyCricketttt. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Hi - I have to look at things as a whole. If you've got sub-100 edits, and everything you've posted in the last two months is on the same subject (together with - count'em - seven reverts in one day) then I have to think "why are you here, really?". Your earlier edits on Anonymous looked (mainly) alright, so I'm sure you can see why the later ones are, to say the least, problematic. Black Kite (talk) 22:30, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Unblock discussion

• Welp, I guess the one issue I can address is EDITWARring. How does one handle a CONTENTDISPUTE? What does one do instead of edit warring?
• Other people edit warring is irrelevant in terms of addressing your block.
• Other wiki's don't count. You were edit warring here. I guess there's some OWNership problems too.
• The admins's only concern is to end the disruption. If you are choosing to stop editing here, and if that's the only way you can not edit disruptively, that is your concern. That is not a reason to unblock you. It just shows you need to learn how to constructively deal with disputes.
• If my esteemed colleague sees a partial block preventing you from editing AlphaBay as a way forward, then I heartily recommend it. I don't know if there is a deeper issue I do not see.
• If the root cause of this disruption is an inability to deal with disputes, then I've already told you what is needed -describe what to do in a content dispute.. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:04, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

  PS. If anyone feels like accepting this or declining this, please ignore my kibitzing. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:14, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

  Ach, du lieber! Jimminy Cricket! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:33, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

  It was a pretty difficult situation. Made edits, and people were fine with them for like a month, then some random two guys started edit warring with me, eventually another 2 dudes came in ( one of which i thought was a moderator at the time ) made a final decision to keep my edits and to stop the edit warring so that was the end of it for like 2-3 weeks, then some new guy came in and started nonstop edit warring with myself and the two other users, when finally an actual admin came in told us to dispute it on the talk page. Multiple of us discussed it for like another couple weeks and nobody could come to an agreement especially since the page itself is of a peculiar nature and half of the sources aren't considered by wikipedia itself to be valid since they're all on "illegal darknet" type stuff.

  So it was a difficult decision and in the end just resulted in edit warring again. I take full blame for my actions and understand the point you're making. If you want to block me from Alphabay that's fine. I am on the spectrum so I have a very difficult time sometimes reading social cues and subcontext especially over the internet where it's hard for even normal people, so I didn't realize what was wrong about it at the time but after reading the articles you sourced it makes a lot more sense and I didn't mean to disrupt Wikipedia.

  Furthermore, I made two accounts because I'm an idiot and forgot my password one day and couldn't figure it out so just ended up making a new account and then resetting this one later on when I had a cooler head lol. Anyway, yeah if Alphabay admin's want me to stop editing that's fine and they can give me a block or whateever but I still want to contribute to Wikipedia as a whole Chimney Sweepa (talk) 05:35, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

  @Ninjarobotsamurai @Deepfriedokra Chimney Sweepa (talk) 20:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

  • Special:CentralAuth/JimmenyCricketttt
  • Special:Log/block?page=User:JimmenyCricketttt
  • Special:Contributions/JimmenyCricketttt
  • Special:CentralAuth/Chimney_Sweepa
  • Special:Log/block?page=User:Chimney+Sweepa
  • Special:Contributions/Chimney_Sweepa

  Shows overlap. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:17, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

  I too am autistic. To the point where my only interaction is here, online, where it is safe. Where there are no non verbal cues here to be blind to. And where I can take my time to respond. Many of us on Wikipedia have some mental health issue or another. One of those is Tamzin. Here is an essay she wrote-- User:Tamzin/Guidance for editors with mental illnesses. I value it greatly. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:25, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

  Thanks for the reply, and thank you for sharing that article, it was very eye opening and inspiring. I hope i have a chance to prove I can be better than I once was @Deepfriedokra Chimney Sweepa (talk) 02:24, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Further socking

See Special:Contributions/LeelaOneEye (blocked by me as a duck). SmartSE (talk) 09:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)