User talk:Chilhamunited
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chilham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Gavbadger (talk) 20:03, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
[edit]Hi Chilhamunited! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
November 2013
[edit]Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Brian May. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 15:17, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Palawan stink badger, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]!
Guarangutang (talk) 17:20, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 18:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)Chilhamunited (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't know why I am blocked. I haven't used this account for years. I wish to contribute to the wikipedia community. Thank you in advance. Chilhamuntied x
Decline reason:
While a wish to contribute to Wikipedia is welcome, I don't for a moment believe that you don't know why you were blocked - perhaps if you'd avoided trolling like this you'd have had an easier time remembering? I've reverted the block notification to its original version, so perhaps you might like to read it and look back on your contributions, and then address your past behaviour in any new unblock request you might make. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Chilhamunited (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Thank you for your words, but I'm not sure that addresses my question. Please unblock me. I have a wife and family to support. I need this job. Chilhamunited (talk) 13:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You'll need to address the vandalism that got you blocked in the first place; and if you're a paid contributor, we'll need a paid-contribution disclosure as well. --jpgordon::==( o ) 13:54, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Because of your continued trolling, this time by this rewriting of my decline of your block request, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. Please go and find someone else to annoy. (And should you one day grow up and decide you genuinely want to help, please see WP:UTRS) - Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:54, 25 April 2016 (UTC)