User talk:Chicken9182
Welcome!
[edit]
|
August 2016
[edit]Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Doctor Zhivago (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:22, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at The Godfather Part II shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Gareth Griffith-Jones | The Welsh | Buzzard | 11:47, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
October 2016
[edit]Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made a change to an article, V for Vendetta (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
November 2016
[edit]- Please do not remove column splitters from articles as you did at The Human Factor (1979 film). Lists are columnised to utilise the wasted whitespace that often occurs when lists are added to articles. Readers are not well surved by a long vertical list plonked in the middle of the article; it is aesthetically poor and causes unnecessary scrolling. Betty Logan (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
WikiProject Film Invitation
[edit]Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Film? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.
If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Peaceray (talk) 21:23, 24 July 2017 (UTC) |
September 2017
[edit]Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Gandhi (film), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 17:43, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Chicken9182. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
October 2018
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shaun of the Dead, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The Old JacobiteThe '45 13:43, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Slumdog Millionaire, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 18:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Slumdog Millionaire. MarnetteD|Talk 20:17, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:55, 19 October 2018 (UTC)Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Crying Game, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. The Old JacobiteThe '45 13:37, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Chicken9182. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)