User talk:Chick Bowen

This user may have left Wikipedia. Chick Bowen has not edited Wikipedia since 11 December 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives for periods ending:

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Portal.svg

A tag has been placed on File:Portal.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:28, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Soyinka and Cheney-Coker.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Soyinka and Cheney-Coker.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:40, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Chick Bowen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Missing rationale short

Template:Missing rationale short has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ^{[Username Needed]} 11:48, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Orphaned short

Template:Orphaned short has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ^{[Username Needed]} 11:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Replaceable short

Template:Replaceable short has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ^{[Username Needed]} 11:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Orphaned short

Template:Orphaned short has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ^{[Username Needed]} 14:41, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Replaceable short

Template:Replaceable short has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ^{[Username Needed]} 14:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello ...... I'm writing a book on memorable baseball player names, and would like to use your image of Boof Bonser in it. I'd of course give you photo credit. Please let me know if this is OK with you. Diane1stman (talk) 23:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure 2607:FB91:1840:FA6:51F2:4C6F:EC90:E975 (talk) 12:09, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Mário de Andrade

I have nominated Mário de Andrade for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]