User talk:Chichichihua

Welcome!

Hello, Chichichihua, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! VanTucky ^(talk) 00:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chihuahua

Please remember to sign all your talk posts with four tildes (~). Second, the main image is not a boston terrier mix, it's just an unusual color. Please discuss this on the talk page of the Chihuahua article. Lastly, all users should be welcomed. But it is my right and I am encouraged by Wikipedia's purpose to revert any changes to articles that I think are incorrect. VanTucky ^(talk) 00:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have now been reverted by two editors for the same edit. Please do not repeat the edit, but instead take it to the talk page, or else it may be construed as WP:Vandalism. Thanks. --David Shankbone 00:03, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

replacing a half breed with a true chihuahua is vandalism? Chichichihua 00:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The dog is not a half breed Chihuahua, but a pure breed. Please do not revert again, and also please do not WP:Canvas as you have done here. --David Shankbone 00:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i know chihuahuas. that "tri colored" fleabag is not a purebred, he is a silly looking mutt. and chihuahuas rarely play on grass, being indoors on a bed is far more realisitc. Chichichihua 00:12, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't replacing the tri-colored Chihuahua, but the lead Chihuahua, and there is consensus for virtually all photographs on the page. I have already alerted one admin to your behavior. If you continue to edit war and revert, I will take it the admin incident board and you will be blocked. Two editors now have told you that your edits are not acceptable, and some time to read up on policies and guidelines may be in order. Thanks.--David Shankbone 00:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Please be aware that it is important to discuss changes that are controversial on the article's talk page rather than simply reverting. Reverting more than three times in a 24-hour period is expressly forbidden by the 3 revert rule. VanTucky ^(talk) 00:14, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your request

First off, I am not David's keeper. Second, he is correct in reverting what is clearly image vandalism. VanTucky ^(talk) 23:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repeatedly reverting, without any consensus-building discussion, to an image that was uniformly decided by talk consensus to be unsuitable, meets the definition of vandalism. Disruptive additions of images and other content that have been summarily deemed counterproductive is an attack on Wikipedia's integrity, as is a complete and utter refusal to discuss the suitability of content in the proscribed manner. VanTucky ^(talk) 03:33, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chihuahua

This is your last warning.
The next time you upload an inappropriate image, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --David Shankbone 15:21, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You've been blocked for 31 hours for disruptive editing, despite clearly being warned. You are free to edit after the block expires, but keep in mind that repeated disruption could lead to longer blocks.-Wafulz 19:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

huh? i hope you blocked those edit warriors davishankbone and vantucky. Chichichihua 19:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Banned

Checkuser shows that you edit from the same IP range as the person who has previously harassed David Shankbone over his image at Afro. Combined with the fact that your first edit was to dispute another of Shankbone's photos, I conclude you are the same person and your account is now banned indefinitely. Thatcher131 15:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]