User talk:Chiafriend12

Yo

Can yuo please create a RSWiki forum topic saying that I will not be editing for a while? My internet is messed up and cannot access RS or the wiki. PLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE?????????? Cashman286 ^talk 23:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hullo! looks like your talk page is pretty blank... btw, u spk 1337? coolio! Codenametiger

Yup, I speak 1337. 1337 |5 l||<3 7074||'/ 4vv35()m3!!! ÇɧĭДfrĪĔпd12 18:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well this sucks...

This is Chia. There seems to be problems with Wikipedia accepting my password and sending a new one to my e-mail, which I DID enter into my preferences. So this may be the end to my account! :( --67.171.218.238 21:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I remembered it. {{ÇɧĭДfrĪĔпd12}} 23:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Just poppin' in to say Hello. Btw, I am Emosworld (as you know me on the rswiki, rs fanon wiki, halopedia and dark runescape wiki). Weirdy Talk 05:44, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol :)

Weirdy Talk 20:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile Day

Weirdy (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Weirdy Talk 04:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

W00T THx! Weirdy Talk 19:26, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Hoobler

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Donald Hoobler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BowChickaNeowNeow (talk) 20:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Smosh

They can change their birthday on myspace, so it would change their age...but i didn't notice that their myspace page was linked from their youtube page...good enough reference for me, I'll fix it! Ctjf83Talk 03:26, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charles Grant (soldier)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charles Grant (soldier), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Livna-Maor (talk) 21:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Smosh

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Smosh. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smosh (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha

Nice job on the redirect there. 64.252.207.229 (talk) 23:08, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who's that IP, Hi Chia, it's me! EditzTalk 23:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 04:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hi

hi chia bae ~ty^(talk) 05:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Impersonation attempt

I have reverted the edits (something you can easily do yourself if this happens again) and I have blocked the other account indefinitely for such a blatant violation of the username policy (And this is the very first time in years of enforcing that policy that I have come across an account so blatantly created and used for that purpose). Daniel Case (talk) 16:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: not funposting at reddit <3

Nomination of Warren Muck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warren Muck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Muck until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 22:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Donald Hoobler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Hoobler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Hoobler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 14:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

〷 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 〷. Since you had some involvement with the 〷 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:44, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]