User talk:Chhandama/Archive 8
You have removed my edits. I assume it's a problem of parallel edits.Xx236 (talk) 11:48, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- No need to intervene while I am in the process of writing this article. Chhandama (talk) 11:57, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India)
[edit]Greetings,
It is being planned to organize Wikigraphists Bootcamp in India, please fill out the survey form to help the organizers. Your responses will help organizers understand what level of demand there is for the event (how many people in your community think it is important that the event happens). At the end of the day, the participants will turn out to have knowledge to create drawings, illustrations, diagrams, maps, graphs, bar charts etc. and get to know to how to tune the images to meet the QI and FP criteria. For more information and link to survey form, please visit Talk:Wikigraphists Bootcamp (2018 India). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Supporting Indian Wikipedia Program resource distribution
[edit]In 2017 - 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India chapter (WMIN) and user groups will pilot a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program (Code name: Project Tiger) will:
- (a) Support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and
- (b) Sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
The objective of the program is to provide laptops and internet stipends for existing editors who need support to contribute more actively. 50 basic model Acer Chromebooks and Internet stipends for 100 contributors are available for distribution. Provided resources are the sole property of the beneficiaries and should be used for the betterment of the movement.
If you're an active Wikimedian, and interested to receive support from this project, please apply. It will take around 10 minutes of your time, and will ask descriptive questions about your contribution to Indic Wikimedia projects.
- Apply at: Supporting Indian Language Wikipedias Program#Apply for support
- Last date for submitting applications is 11th February 2018, 11:59 IST.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Project Tiger Writing Contest
[edit]In 2017 – 2018, the Wikimedia Foundation and Google working in close coordination with the Centre for Internet and Society (CIS), Wikimedia India Chapter (WMIN) and user groups from India, are piloting a program encouraging Wikipedia communities to create locally relevant and high-quality content in Indian languages. This program will (a) support active and experienced Wikipedia editors through the donation of laptops and stipends for internet access and (b) sponsor a language-based contest that aims to address existing Wikipedia content gaps.
Phase (a) has been completed, during which active contributors were awarded laptops and internet stipends. Phase (b) will be a contest in which editors will come together and develop a writing contest focused on content gaps. Each month three individual prizes will be awarded to each community based on their contribution for the month. The prizes worth 3,000 INR, 2000 INR, and 1,000 INR, will be awarded to the top contributors for each month. The contest started at March 1, 2018, 0:00, and will end at May 31, 2018, 23:59 (IST). Useful links are as follows:
- Sign up at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Participants
- List of the articles can be referred at: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest/Topics
- Submit/report your articles/contributions at: https://tools.wmflabs.org/fountain/editathons/project-tiger-2018-en
- For more details, rules, FAQ etc. kindly refer: Wikipedia:Project Tiger Writing Contest
Looking forward your participation, all the best. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) at 22:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC).
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
[edit]- please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2017 Cure Award | |
In 2017 you were one of the top ~250 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs. |
Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 02:44, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Wish
[edit]Hello. Help expansion article Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you. 125.214.49.215 (talk) 07:45, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry. The page is already tagged for deletion (see the discussion page), and it is no use crying over spilt milk. Chhandama (talk) 08:10, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bacterial secretion system
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Bacterial secretion system requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://colloidalfrere.blogspot.com/2015/04/secretion.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- And this I think is a very hasty and imprudent decision. The said blogspot is, in all honesty, one that I have never ever seen, and I cannot even access it right now to know its content. If my article had been carefully read, it opens (the lead section, rather lengthy one) entirely and genuinely with my own words. In fact the rest of the text, i.e. Type I secretion, etc. came from the page Secretion. If mine is a copyright infringement, that page should also be immediately deleted. In fact, my plan is to present an exhaustive article on bacterial secretion system with new scientific information which are not covered in "Secretion" and sub-articles, and rewrite my page entirely. It is disappointing also that I am not given even a chance to justify (contest the nomination by visiting the page is already dead). I have so far worked diligently in improving medicine and biology information through Wikipedia. This action is a bit discouraging. Therefore, I request you to restore the page, and I shall do the rest. Chhandama (talk) 09:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Looking for an accurate identification of an insect
[edit]Hi, would you have any idea of the binomial name of what is known as "thangnang" - mentioned in various places as either a bug or a beetle - supposedly an indicator of famines? Shyamal (talk) 15:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- Never mind, I think a couple of sources indicate it as Ochrophora montana (Distant). Shyamal (talk) 15:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
- That is correct. Chhandama (talk) 04:48, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
As the same tribal origin, you know better than me. For archaiac soceity like ours, oral traditions like traditional war songs, nursery ryhmes, sacred incantations are the only sources from which we trace history. Concerning my addition to Rih Dil, I have originally mentioned part of traditional war songs. You would know the value of such as the same tribesman. Further, I have included another academic journal called Zolus as additional source here again [cf., Thang San Mung, “Sialkidul Li,” in Zolus Journal (17/2013), Yangon, Myanmar]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khumpita (talk • contribs) 17:27, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for clarifying. But do note that this is English Wikipedia, and not a local dialect one, such that it demands strict verifiability and reliability. Without verifiable sources, folktales and ethnic songs make no legitimate information. It is good that you have added one magazine as a source, but then outside of Myanmar, we don't have any mean to verify it, but I take it for granted that it is authentic. And take care that you follow the system of citation. Just one more point, if I write to your talk page, you may continue the conversation there. Chhandama (talk) 03:18, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Operation Hope Not
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing—Operation Hope Not—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. U-Mos (talk) 22:19, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Chhandama. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 1
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Hope Not, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bernard Fitzalan-Howard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Death and funeral of Winston Churchill
[edit]On 30 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Death and funeral of Winston Churchill, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Operation Hope Not was the codename for planning Winston Churchill's funeral (procession pictured), the largest state funeral in British history? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Death and funeral of Winston Churchill), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Rokunga
[edit]Hello, rather than undoing my edit on Rokunga, perhaps you could offer a reason why and/or add a section yourself, or remove the tag if it's unneccesary? Bungle (talk • contribs) 08:23, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for sharing your concern. I an aware of making sections in articles, but my (minor) concern is that the text is too small and unlikely to increase so that only one section "Posthumous recognition", which does not reflect his notability, may be inappropriate; thus, it may be better to let it remain a stub. And my major concern is that you changed the statement "...most popular of which are" to "...the most popular believed to be", which you did not justify. According to who? The fact is that the original editor (which I am not) made his preferred list and missed other equally popular songs such as Lentupui Kai Vel, Tlawmngaihna hlu and others which are included in university literature curricula. These songs are also used as band music among Assam Rifles and Mizoram Armed Police – one can hear them every Republic Day and Independence Day. Moreover, the article ignores Rokunga's Christmas songs which are not only among the most popular but also the only traditional Christmas songs to Mizo people. That said "...believed to be" is a understatement. Chhandama (talk) 03:35, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for your thorough response. If you feel sectioning isn't appropriate, then perhaps just remove the "needs sections" tag, which would have explained a bit more to me regarding your edit. On the other point, I felt "believed to be" was preferable to suggesting outright which are most popular, without an apparent credible source to substantiate this; your note of "according to who" could apply in equal measure when making a popularity assertion. It doesn't bother me though, as I have no particular interest in the article, which I encounted at the articles needing sections category, though i'd suggest removing the tag if you don't feel it's necessary at this time. Bungle (talk • contribs) 09:07, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit]
Excavata
[edit]Just curiouis why you reverted my edit on Excavata. 84.208.233.159 (talk) 17:36, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
- Describing Euglenozoa right in the middle of Exacavata definition is inappropriate, besides its lack of citation. Chhandama (talk) 03:37, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Mizoram University Logo
[edit]Dude, before undoing someone's changes at least take a good look twice about what's right and what's not. The current version is indeed the new logo of Mizoram University. Check it out on mzu.edu.in — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.67.123.25 (talk) 14:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
WikiProject India
[edit]Namaste, Chhandama. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Peace Dove
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for January 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Alex Stokes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to John Randall
- He Jiankui affair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to William Hurlbut
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
TheFamousPeople.com as a source
[edit]Hi Chhandama. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source in Peter Medawar. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks.--Ronz (talk) 15:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's OK. It is rather hard to keep up with all unreliable sources. I notice that Hipal has deleted it. Chhandama (talk) 03:05, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Insulin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Best (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit]India 10,000 challenge
[edit]WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge
[edit]move
[edit]It's now back at 65803 Didymos. I hope that's what you wanted. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. I will now create a new article for Dimorphos. Chhandama (talk) 04:48, 1 July 2020 (UTC)