User talk:Chhandama/Archive 4

The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014

The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the {{User WPMed}} template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.[reply]

BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors

Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: Wikipedia:BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move function

Hi! As an FYI, please use one of these two options when you want to move a page:

1. Use the "Move" function so all of the page history is transferred
2. Wikipedia:Move request - You are welcome to simply make a request to move a page

Thank you WhisperToMe (talk) 12:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Giovanni Battista Grassi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of dogs, and showed that the parasite completed its development in human fleas, Pulex irritans.[Spider Koenenia mirabilis in 1885, dedicated to his wife. He pioneered the insect control 1912

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:38, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FOXP2 article

you have done a good job merging the articles. dolfrog (talk) 02:22, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 2 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Melatonin page, your edit caused an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:45, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:16, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dodo

Hi there, the sourcing is still insufficient. Dates of some sources seem to be wrong/inconsistent as well. If it isn't fixed, I'll have to revert. FunkMonk (talk) 15:25, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quentin D. Wheeler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gelae

On 15 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gelae, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Gelae baen, Gelae balae, Gelae donut, Gelae fish, and Gelae rol are beetles of the genus Gelae? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gelae. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes

Hi Chhandama, thank you for your work reviewing pending changes! Please ensure, however, that you don't accept changes that introduce unsourced personal information to BLPs as was done here. These are the type of edits that I applied pending changes to protect against. Thank you, --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:54, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my bad. But the edit was actually a correct information in the infobox. However, I was mistaken of not checking the text for citation. I shall edit it myself to redeem my oversight. Chhandama (talk) 08:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism reverts

Hey there! Just wanted to make a note of this undoing. The edit, while confusing and not properly formatted, isn't vandalism and shouldn't be labelled as such. The editor is actually part of a school program to edit bio-related articles; we've been getting quite a few edits that aren't properly done, but are with good intention. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 21:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the misunderstanding/ignorance of the editor's background. But the text was clearly out of place, and made no sense. Chhandama (talk) 08:15, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Check in on Precambrian rabbit article

Hi. You might want to check in on the Precambrian rabbit article, as one editor seems intent on reposting what I presume to be his or her original research. Instead of getting into an edit war, I have prominently noted the unsourced nature of the text, which this editor has repeatedly added to this article. Paul H. (talk) 01:28, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out. I have removed it and explained on the talk page. Chhandama (talk) 03:25, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sangthankima, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rehabilitation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chhandama/Science vision

Hi, this draft has been in your userspace for about a year, without any edits. The journal obviously does not meet either [[WP:NJournals]) or WP:GNG, so it would most likely get deleted at AfD if you would move it to article space. What are you planning on doing with it? It obviously cannot stay in your user space forever. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is not likely to gain acceptance. Please delete it with my full consent. Chhandama (talk) 02:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Happy editing! --Randykitty (talk) 07:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]