User talk:Chgwheeler

Welcome!

Hello, Chgwheeler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --ragesoss 16:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to philosophy articles

Yo, I reverted your edition of Wheeler, Charles Gidley (2004). Basic Flying Instruction, a comprehensive introduction to Western philosophy. iUniverse. ISBN 0-595-32160-7. to specific philosophy pages. The further reading and references sections of philosophy articles are reserved for sources that deal specifically with that topic, not broad overviews (except in cases where only broad overviews are available). Consequently, this book is only suitable for articles such as Western philosophy. Regards, Skomorokh 16:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might also want to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest if you have not done so already.--ragesoss 17:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked indefinitely without further warning.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you.

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Specifically, you appear to be spamming literature written by Charles Gidley Wheeler. Please stop.--Ronz 17:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Gidley Wheeler

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Charles Gidley Wheeler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Rbellin|Talk 19:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]