User talk:Chez224

2022 monkeypox outbreak task force invitation

Hello! I know you have an interest in the ongoing 2022 monkeypox outbreak, so I wanted to invite you to the Monkeypox Outbreak Task Force, which I started from the WikiProject of current events. A task force is similar to a WikiProject, with the exception that a larger WikiProject (in this case, the Current Events WikiProject) "host" the task force. The Monkeypox Outbreak Task Force’s goal is to improve any and all articles relating to the new outbreak. I hope you consider joining! Elijahandskip (talk) 23:50, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello thank you for the invite I will have a look at the link you sent to me sure. Chez224 (talk) 01:27, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh you have got to be kidding me are you really that salty?

I did say I have no further input so blocking was unnecessary. Also I never edited the article once so how do I challenge this? Why are you trying to silence and censor me?

Shall we dig a really deep hole this time? Media are watching my profile. Chez224 (talk) 04:45, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a clarification, I am not an admin so I cannot block you. Please see the section below for the reason you were blocked. Elijahandskip (talk) 04:50, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies I posted this in the wrong message board I believe this was not supposed to be directed at you. Apologies again. Chez224 (talk) 04:51, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Because of your disruptive editing, you have been indefinitely blocked from editing Talk:2022 monkeypox outbreak and 2022 monkeypox outbreak. If you disrupt any other monkeypox articles, you will be blocked sitewide. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 (talk) 04:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh you have got to be kidding me are you really that salty?

I did say I have no further input so blocking was unnecessary. Also I never edited the article once so how do I challenge this? Why are you trying to silence and censor me?

Shall we dig a really deep hole this time? Media are watching my profile. Chez224 (talk) 04:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you realise how salty you all look with pushing those out of date statistics? And it looks like you are attacking me personally people are very confused as to why a big organisation such as Wikipedia and worldly governments are seemingly adamant on taking on one person to one up then?

Baffling history in the making. Chez224 (talk) 00:24, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chez224 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I was blocked on grounds of homophobic censorship. I did not disrupt editing my views are sanct and fair and there is no reason to silence me other than for Wikipedias nefarious gainChez224 (talk) 09:02, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were not blocked for your specific views, but for misusing the article talk page in violation os WP:NOTAFORUM. You said "This is the talk section of the article where users are invited to discuss the subject more freely."; that is incorrect, talk pages are for discussing article changes or other issues with the article itself, they are not for anything that a person wishes to say about it. You were asked repeatedly to provide sources for your claims as well as specific issues with the article and did not. If you would like to edit that article or its talk page again, you will need to provide assurance that your behavior will change going forward. As this request does not do that, I am declining it. You are still able to edit the rest of the encyclopedia, perhaps you will find a less controversial topic easier to paritipate in. Keep in mind that as a private entity, Wikipedia can determine what appears on its computers, just as you can determine what is said and done within the four walls of your residence. 331dot (talk) 09:25, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chez224 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Chez224 (talk) 09:51, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your comments below very, very strongly indicate this block should be extended sitewide. I'm not doing so at this time so you have a chance to read how Wikipedia works. You clearly haven't the slightest clue at the moment. Yamla (talk) 09:58, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I will provide my assurance not to be "disruptive" again but you are all making yourself look very silly to the media and the public eye blocking me and rejecting it in the first place. You look unbelievably petty and homophobic.

I was unable to provide sources no but then neither were the other party except for pushed hearsay. And those statistics are now over two weeks out of date anyway.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chez224 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have a good idea of how salty and homophobic you are all yes as does the rest of the world. You have no right or reason to ban me you are being outright homophobic and you are breaking wiki rules trying to censor me thank you. Chez224 (talk) 10:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion, this is Susvdhd evading their block. I have updated the block to reflect this. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.