User talk:Chesterct
BAID
[edit]Your removal of the alumni list from BAID seems a bit unilateral to me. Against all wikipedia policy i consider the article to be mine, or at least under my protection. That BAID was not a school per se is a fine addition, but not every architect/sculptor/whatever in America went through it's progams and identifying folks who DID (esp. those already in wikipedia) seems to me to be a worthwhile activity. Finding information on BAID is not easy so I feel disapointed about seeing any of it removed. Carptrash (talk) 16:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Response Wikipedia articles are to provide accurate information about their topics. BAID was never a school and, therefore, cannot be said to have had alumni. Individual architecture students did not "go through its programs." All BAID did was to prepare architectural problem statements (called programmes) and make them available to schools and independent ateliers to use or not as they wished. Schools and independent ateliers could also send students' projects to BAID in New York to be reviewed; some did, some did not.Chesterct (talk) 14:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- We have all come to our study of BAID from different perspectives. Feel free to make yours the focus of the article. Carptrash (talk) 15:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
As per your thoughts expressed that: The article ought to focus primarily on architectural education, since that was the focus of BAID. The material on sculptors seems secondary
I am not going to pursue this sort of thing any more. Carptrash (talk) 16:49, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
BAID was never a school and, therefore, cannot be said to have had alumni.
This might come as a surprise to many of the students who enrolled in the sculpture program (one of four programs available, architecture, sculpture, painting and mosaics) and took classes at/in the classrooms and studios at the BAID campus (one building large) in NYC. Perhaps your undersatnding that the school was just about architecture needs to be reexamined a bit, and/or the meanings of the words "architecture" and "alumnus" expanded just a bit? Carptrash (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
A couple of things.
[edit]
If you write something, anything, on your user page then your name will show up in blue instead of red, making you at least appear to be a serious wikipedia editor.
It is no longer my habit to make very many edits in wikipedia, having had too many hours of my work DELETED by other editors. My BAID material is not in one place in my archives but is located in books and pamphlets and files and xeroxes all over the place. I am not really interested in footnoting what I'm supplying you with as fodder for discussion. I am having this discussion with you in the hope that you will revert at least some of the stuff that you cut out, but that is up to you. Also, in the wish that you will be a bit slower to remove information from articles unless you are very sure that it does not belong there.
Here is a copy from the Bulletin of the Beaux-Arts Institute of Design (June 1927)that specifically refers to "students of BAID."
If you deem it advisable, divide the wikipedia entry into sections, but be aware that there were, at least in 1925, three Departments at BAID, and by 1927 this number had risen to four. They were (1927) Architecture, Sculpture, Mural Painting and Interior Decoration. Something that you should (in my opinion) at least be aware of. Carptrash (talk) 16:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
BAID
[edit]Interesting discussion regarding BAID. Although the architectural literature makes it appear that the BAID focused exclusively on architectural competitions, apparently the organization had multiple divisions addressing sculpture, mural painting, etc. Chesterct (talk) 18:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Scheuerman Block in Seattle
[edit]You say there is "no evidence [that the] Scheuerman Block [is] by [Elmer] Fisher." The Seattle Department of Neighborhoods seems to think otherwise. That would usually be considered a pretty reliable source. Do you have some reason to think they are wrong? Or is it just that it was missing from some particular list of his work that you consulted? It's certainly in keeping with his style. - Jmabel | Talk 05:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds like you found a better source. Good.
- By the way, you put my remarks on my user page instead of my user talk page, which is not a good idea. I just finally stumbled across them now. - Jmabel | Talk 00:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Chesterct! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Leland M. Roth - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Talk or walk (talk) 21:43, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Washington State Book Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Mountford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit] Hello Chesterct! Thank you for your contributions. I am an editor alerting you that a second of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Richard Guy Wilson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 05:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Chesterct. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Barry Onouye for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Onouye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Boleyn (talk) 08:58, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Barry Onouye for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Onouye (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.