User talk:Chesster Man

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Ockenbock (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chesster Man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am truly sorry. What can I do to get back my editing privileges?

Decline reason:

You have been blocked indefinitely. Please contact the blocking admin. -- Yamla 00:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chesster Man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How do I contact him if I cannot edit his user talk?

Decline reason:

Your edits follow a pattern of edits; see the edit history of User talk:Metros for all interested. -- Natalya 04:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You can email him using the "E-mail this user" link on the side of his user page, but I will also let him know that you are requesting to be unblocked. -- Natalya 04:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to unblock you, Chesster: you're an obvious sockpuppet trying to be disruptive. Please don't do it any more. Thank you, Antandrus (talk) 04:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE? Look, I am truly sorry. I'll contibute to the wikimedia foundation if you unblock me! --Chesster Man 06:10, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK! I ADMITTED I AM A SOCK PUPPET! Just please stop this, and I will stop. I am truly sorry. But this all started with Metros232! He got in to my private buisness, just talking to myself on Wikipedia. I got blocked for no reason! Then I tried and tried to convince him, but NO! Please, please, I promise I will never vandalize again! --Chesster Man 06:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]