User talk:Chernavsky George Yury

AfD nomination of Yury Chernavsky

I've nominated Yury Chernavsky, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Yury Chernavsky satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yury Chernavsky and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Yury Chernavsky during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. GDonato (talk) 15:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did the patern for Damon Elliott. Please live this for a 1 day and article will be fixed up as required by wiki/ --GC 06:00, 6 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chernavsky George Yury (talk • contribs) [reply]
- Please, let me know what you suppose to do? Today is too late, and I can make everything only tomorrow. Thanks --GC 06:20, 6 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chernavsky George Yury (talk • contribs) [reply]

Possible Result

How about we move the English article into your user page until you can find some reliable sources for it or get an independant, reliable translation of Russian sources, then we can check notability and move it back into an article; how would you feel about that? GDonato (talk) 13:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sir,

I’ve explained you that nothing I can do in a few days. Please keep me informed about the available time for editing and your intentions. Thanks --GC 21:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I'd be willing to carry out the move for you and help you to find reliable sources as necessary if you want it as it seems that other editors believe you are notable enough for an article. GDonato (talk) 21:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I will much appreciate it, Sir. Several links I'm going to copy from my Rus. article. Is it not prohibited? --GC 05:47, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Article

Hello, since it appears you and your article are here to stay, I have added you to the list of Wikipedians well-known enough to have your own article. See Category:Notable Wikipedians. Good to see the article is in much better shape now than it was before. GDonato (talk) 15:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Sir --GC 06:25, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:G-Landress studio pix.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:G-Landress studio pix.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Elly.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Elly.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Undo

Hi. The article red-linked (IE, there was no page to link to). If the label is/was notable and you can cite notability from a reliable source, then please create the article and I'll add the link back in. Lugnuts 10:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it. Lugnuts 12:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Landress

The article George Landress has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP. No significant coverage found. He has worked on recordings by notable musicians but I can find no evidence that anybody has ever written about him beyond brief mentions.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 20:52, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]