User talk:Cheney kay Dogra

February 2020

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to User:Monkbot—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 16:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Döğer, İhsaniye. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Samf4u (talk) 16:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Dogar (disambiguation), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Samf4u (talk) 16:33, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dogar, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Dogar. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 05:45, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sardar Hadait-u-llah

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sardar Hadait-u-llah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jat Muslim, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding entries to notable people lists that do not have a corresponding article in English Wikipedia. If they do not have an article they are not notable enough to be listed. noq (talk) 17:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Jats. Repeating the same bad edits will just get the same response. Please read WP:WTAF. noq (talk) 15:37, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for completely unresponsive, disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]