User talk:Chelokabob

Chelokabob, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Chelokabob! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Suggestion for Ali Tajdary article

hello, good day, please suggest ali tajdary article as well, he nominated my article for removal while it has the most valid links and can be cited both in terms of reading and acting, please write your opinion about the article , i think a group is colluding to delete this article. Hoseinkandovan (talk) 09:43, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed, but too many deletes already. One vote will not make a difference. If you can find some good in-depth articles about him, please post and explain which are best or tell me. The issue is that the editors are saying none of these publications are reliable. Of course, myself, am not too familiar with many, I know a few like Javanan, Iranian.com, but I don't see that he has coverage in them. It might be best to wait some more time until he has more news coverage and try again. Chelokabob (talk) 10:00, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tabakhsh

Because a manager likes to delete this article and wants to delete this article with personal intention, it does not matter who the article is anymore.This manager completely violates the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.But because he is a manager, no one has anything to do with him and he does whatever he wants, so the opinion of other users does not matter at all from the point of view of this manager. For example, these two IPs(Special:Contributions/106.168.123.161=Special:Contributions/219.251.78.18) are for a person who has voted twice in the same poll, but no manager will edit him because he agrees with the manager.--2A01:5EC0:B807:59AD:40F3:6799:1B77:3A17 (talk) 19:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for this manager's work is also not clear. EP even tried to tag Mehdi Ayoubi's article.But two editors admin returned it.But iP Socks again joined hands with the same admin They took the article to the AFD.not interesting😂--2A01:5EC0:B807:59AD:40F3:6799:1B77:3A17 (talk) 19:10, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, there are 2 IP voters that voted Delete. I brought this up to the attention of Admin just now in the Delete page. check my comments. I do not know whey someone has such personal Vendetta to place Delete votes from IP's. Infact, now the page is locked and you cannot vote from IP anymore, so to be fair they need to remove these too. Chelokabob (talk) 19:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Refer to the manager's discussion to prove that IPs are socks.This is an example of the same socks playing the same IP in the manager's discussion with the two IPs given by the manager And with the first IP, it has also tagged articles.--2A01:5EC0:B807:59AD:40F3:6799:1B77:3A17 (talk) 19:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mr.NuggetGu This account also belongs to the same IP.I think you should open a review(Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations) file for IPs and accounts.--2A01:5EC0:B807:59AD:40F3:6799:1B77:3A17 (talk) 19:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's an interesting one too! several of his edits have been reverted for disrupting editing! Chelokabob (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overall versions of this IP are very interesting,This person is an old Wikipedia user.Because his editions are fully acquainted with politics say so.--2A01:5EC0:B807:59AD:40F3:6799:1B77:3A17 (talk) 20:28, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But he may not be the same person. Just some random guy that voted delete, but he is definitely an experienced editor and is probably an Undisclosed Paid editor, just trying to sneak in some paid editing. Chelokabob (talk) 21:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not admin, so I cant open investigation. But you can post a request on the talk page of it Wikipedia_talk:Sockpuppet_investigations.Chelokabob (talk) 21:19, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is interesting to take a look here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hoseinkandovan I don't think we should have talked about the manager.😂😂Because iP socks quickly put our name on the list.It's really interesting how much this IP behaves like a manager who solves his personal problems with wiki articles.🤣From now on, we must call this sock a manager.😂I really wonder how this person is a manager and easily plays socks and works with himself.😁--2A01:5EC0:B807:59AD:40F3:6799:1B77:3A17 (talk) 00:26, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow they are now investigating me for being sock! thanks for sending that link. As I have nothing to do with you or the socks, I hope that they will make the right decision. Chelokabob (talk) 03:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently, that IP was ArmanAfifeh, who has been on enwiki socking for a long time but still has awful English grammar. I'm certain this kid has a miserable lifestyle and is 100% jobless. lol, whose laughing now 🤣. 180.0.123.50 (talk) 10:15, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Expertwikiguy per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Expertwikiguy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]