User talk:Chegman
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Policy on neutral point of view
- Guideline on external links
- Guideline on conflict of interest
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Dlohcierekim 20:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Please be civil
[edit]
Regarding your comments on User talk:Dlohcierekim: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Satori Son 21:26, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. This looked like nonsense at best, and likely vandalism or an attack to me. How exactly does the content remotely resemble any other encyclopedia article.? Wonder of the world? Protrudes in a clumsy manner, etc? Nuclear war? Chinular glory? Anything here worth challenging and abusing the deleting admin? On to the matter of verifiability and reliable sources. In the first instance, the ref link makes no mention of the subject. In the second, it does not appear to meet the criteria for a reliable source, independent of the subject, for a reputation for fact checking. I find no Google Hits for this. However, as a matter of personal policy, I am more than willing, on the request of any editor, to restore any article have I deleted and send the matter for discussion at Articles for Deletion. I will be more than happy to do so now with this, if that's what you want. Or, you can appeal the deletion at Deletion Review. Do you wish to do so now? Do be in touch. Cheers, and happy editing. Dlohcierekim 22:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)