User talk:Chefmikesf/sandbox/Giving circle

Updating the Giving circle Wikipedia article

Hi, User:Ost316, I noticed you worked on the Giving circle Wikipedia article in the past and was curious if you'd be open to collaborating on improving the article further. I noticed the article has a flag, lacks secondary sources, and has too many external links and further reading entries. I drafted a new proposed sandbox to address those issues, but I won't edit the article myself due to my COI. Appreciate any feedback or collaboration in advance.--Chefmikesf (talk) 18:23, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

@Chefmikesf: It looks like you did a good job incorporating the references into the text. I copyedited for various aspects, though many were more based on editorial discretion than on policy. In particular, I expanded the lead, reorganized some sections, added wikilinks, and changed the presentation of some text. In particular, I added a number of WP:REDLINKs, but I did not necessarily assess if they were notable. It can be worth checking if some have incoming links and if they are worth creating at least a {{R from related topic}}.

The main parts that I think could use work is the history, networks, and example section. Ideally, each would include a summary of the concept and its history, without the details about specific gifting circles which may not have notability. That would take more time looking over the sources, and I do not think that I will have much more time to look at this draft.

Because this already looks to be a rather extensive cleanup improvement to the current article, I would encourage you to move the article to Mainspace sooner rather than later, lest the mainspace article begin accumulating changes that you would them have to reflect in your draft. Since I have edited your sandbox version, you should use Request Moves to ensure that attribution is retained, even if you sandbox page is deleted. —Ost (talk) 19:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi User:Ost316, I appreciate all the feedback on the sandbox and the editorial suggestions. I went ahead and removed about 10K bytes of extraneous content from the three sections while keeping your editorial suggestions in the sandbox. Do you think I could remove the banners at this point? Or do you have further suggestions for the length of the content?--Chefmikesf (talk) 18:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

@Chefmikesf: Yes, I think you did a good job reducing the specifics that aren't essential for the topic and the cleanup messages can likely be removed. Thank you for considering my input. —Ost (talk) 02:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks @Ost316:! I copied our conversation to the sandbox talk page so others can track the progress. At this point would you be open to move the sandbox to the Wikipedia mainspace? If so, I can move the sandbox to the draft space. Also, I'll add @Headhitter: to the conversation so they can see the progress, they're the primary author of the article --Chefmikesf (talk) 22:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

@Chefmikesf: Yes, I think it is fine to move to mainspace. You may not even need to move it to draft; you can use WP:RM to have it moved from your sandbox. —Ost (talk) 07:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi User:Ost316 I read over WP:RM and I don't see how its the right way to update the article. From my understanding WP:RM is unnecessary for uncontroversial moves and moves from draft namespace or user space to article space. I just have a COI so I want the approval of others to comply with policy. Chefmikesf (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Because you are not the only one that worked on the draft, you can't do a WP:COPYPASTE move from draft or a sandbox without maintaining appropriate copyright/attribution. Requested Move can move the new page and do a WP:HISTMERGE so that the page histories and edits are retained. There are alternative to this process, but this is the route I would generally take to retain proper attribution of edits, per Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. It also appears you can just list all the authors in the edit summary, if you were to copy it over, per Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia#List_of_authors. —Ost (talk) 14:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Ost316:,

I tried to submit the request move, but the template won't publish on a user sandbox or a draft article. I agree with your perspective on giving proper attribution to the editors and have looked for the best way to move forward.

As of today, you and I are the only editors to work on the sandbox. What are your thoughts on replacing the content, section by section or paragraph by paragraph? If someone has an objection, they can address that edit. Then, in each edit summary, we could add something like: (updating the article to improve a neutral point of view, adding secondary sources, removing the flag, and removing extraneous content. Co-authored by User:Ost316 and User:Chefmikesf.)

What are your thoughts? Chefmikesf (talk) 16:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Edit Requests for Giving circle Wikipedia article

2022 Factual Updates

1. Location: Lead Reason and Request: The existing Lead paragraph is OK; the proposed Lead makes a few changes for grammar and accuracy while adding a sentence about giving circle networks. Please replace the current Lead with the proposed Lead. Existing Lead Paragraph sentence A giving circle is a form of participatory philanthropy where groups of individuals donate their own money or time to a pooled fund, decide together where to give these away to charity or community projects and, in doing so, seek to increase their awareness of and engagement in the issues covered by the charity or community project. Many circles, in addition to donating their money, also contribute their time and skills to support local causes. Proposed Lead Paragraph sentence update A giving circle is a form of participatory philanthropy where groups of individuals donate their own money or time to a pooled fund. They decide together where to give these away to individuals, nonprofits, or community projects, seeking to increase their awareness of and engagement in the issues covered by the nonprofits or community project. In many circles, members donate their money and also contribute their time and skills to support local causes. The tradition dates back hundreds of years to mutual aid societies and other forms of communal giving. The practice has been used by various groups in the United States, which may server identity-based or broad audiences. A giving circle network is an organization that serves as a connector to giving circles, providing resources, guidelines and networking opportunities for multiple giving circles who may have shared interests. 2. Location: Structure and function Reason and Request: The existing Structure and function section is outdated, it has some promotion tone in the content, and needs more context on how giving circles work. Please replace the current Structure and function with the proposed Structure and function. Existing Structure and function content The current manifestation of giving circles is a relatively new trend, but it is built on traditions dating back hundreds of years to mutual aid societies and other forms of giving for the community. In the United States, giving circles were initially composed of women; they are now more diverse in race, age and gender, although women continue to make up the majority of members. The structure of the circles can be informal or formal. On the informal side, circles may vote and choose an organization to support and each member writes an individual check. Formal circles may have their money housed at a local community foundation and have staff that support the work of the circle. Giving circles can range in size from a handful of members to several hundred. Individual donors who join or form a giving circle typically seek to build community within their circle through social events, in addition to the economic impacts of the groups. In a 2007 study, the Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers' New Ventures in Philanthropy initiative identified approximately 400 giving circles in the United States, more than double the number from two years earlier. A survey of 160 circles, published in 2008, found they had leveraged nearly $100 million, $13 million of this in 2006 alone. Nearly 12,000 people took part in the 160 giving circles surveyed. Nearly half of circles have male participants, and the popularity of giving circles is also growing among racial, ethnic and tribal communities as well as in the gay and lesbian community. Another study conducted in 2005 by Angela M. Eikenberry, an associate professor at the University of Nebraska at Omaha, found that giving circles generally bring both long-time and new philanthropists to organized philanthropy. For both groups, participation seems to increase levels of giving while bringing “new money” to the nonprofit sector; especially to small and locally based organizations. Members also seem to learn about and give to organizations and individuals, and in areas of interest, they most likely would not have given to otherwise. In addition, members are more thoughtful, focused and strategic in their personal giving because of educational experiences in the giving circle. These findings are based on 30 interviews with giving circle participants, staff, and philanthropic professionals working with giving circles, document analysis, and secondary data. Research by Eikenberry and Jessica Bearman, published in 2009, and largely based on a survey of giving circle members compared to a control group, found that giving circles influence members to give more and to give more strategically. Their members give to a wide array of organizations and are highly engaged in the community. Giving circles increase members’ knowledge about philanthropy, nonprofits, and the community but have a mixed influence on members’ attitudes about philanthropy, nonprofit and government roles, and political/social abilities and values. Level of engagement, length of engagement, and size of the giving circle seem to matter most, when it comes to understanding giving circles’ effects on members. Proposed Structure and function content Giving Circles Explained A giving circle is a form of participatory philanthropy where groups of individuals donate their own money or time to a pooled fund. They decide together where to give these away to individuals, nonprofits, or community projects, seeking to increase their awareness of and engagement in the issues covered by the nonprofits or community project. In many circles, members donate their money and also contribute their time and skills to support local causes. A giving circle is a form of collective giving to mutually approved causes and organizations. They may consist of self-organized small groups, formal membership-based organizations or larger organizations with professional paid staff. In all cases, the organization structures donation amounts for members in varying increments. Roughly 85% of giving circles have a minimum donation, while some ask for donations above $1,000. Members typically pool equal amounts ranging from $50-$5,000 except for some small groups who leave donations to the sole discretion of the donor. Giving circles provide community engagement through pooled gifts and donations. Members are often made up of people who already live in or have ties to the communities in which they support, giving them insight into the specific needs of that community. These factors enable contributions to hyper-local causes which may be overlooked by bigger nonprofits and allow donors who may have less discretionary income to combine their donations with others to make a bigger impact. The structure of the circles can be informal or formal. On the informal side, circles may vote and choose an organization to support and each member writes an individual check. Formal circles may have their money housed at a local community foundation and have staff that support the work of the circle. Giving circles can range in size from a handful of members to several hundred. Formal organizations also known as sponsored or institutional giving circles are structured similarly to traditional membership societies with a board of directors or leadership team, committees, and support staff. Grassroots circles are typically run by the members and self-educated. Individual donors who join or form a giving circle typically seek to build community within their circle through social events, in addition to the economic impacts of the groups. 3. Location: History Reason and Request: The article doesn't have a history section. There is a substantial history of giving circles in books, magazines, and online publications (newspapers). Please add the History section after the Structure and function section on the article. Proposed History content Early history The current model of giving circles is a relatively new trend, but it is built on traditions dating back hundreds of years to mutual aid societies and other forms of communal giving. In the United States, giving circles were initially composed of women; they are now more diverse in race, age and gender, although women continue to make up the majority of members. Indigenous African philanthropy, also referred to as ancient giving circles, took the form of rotating savings and credit associations (ROSCAs) and has been documented in Nigeria and Kenya as a source of financing for social development. An esusu, as it is called by the Yoruba in Nigeria, is a communal fund in which a fixed contribution sum has been decided upon and paid into at a specific time and place. It is then distributed in a lump sum to each member in a rotation to use however they see fit. Examples of this system have also been documented as susu in Trinidad and harambees in Kenya. During the time of slavery in the United States, freedmen and freedwomen pooled resources, then used the money to purchase enslaved freedom. Free African Society was established in 1787 and was a formalized mutual aid society and early predecessor to the giving circle model. In 1793, the organization mobilized funds to support victims of the Yellow Fever Epidemic of Philadelphia. The early and mid-1800s marked a time in United States history where voluntary social, civic, political and professional associations began forming and growing. This idea, as noted by French civil servant, Alexis de Tocqueville, was that groups who shared common interests could unite and influence important social and philanthropic issues facing their families and communities. As the 1800s progressed into the early 1900s, African American philanthropists collectively contributed millions of dollars that were used to create educational initiatives, build schools and support their own community programs. Madam C.J. Walker, listed in the Guinness Book of World Records as the first self-made American woman millionaire, was one of them. Walker’s philanthropy evolved from the sharing and resource-pooling she utilized as a washerwoman and helping with the church collection plates, to becoming a large philanthropic donor and ultimately employing reportedly 20,000 agents of working-class black women to assist in her efforts. Recent history History 1990-2000 In 1990, Peggy Saika founded Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders in Philanthropy (AAPIP), an organization that includes a giving circle network focused on building infrastructure for bridging philanthropy and Asian Pacific American communities. By 1995, there were 50 giving circles in the United States. One of which, was the Washington Women’s Foundation, founded by Colleen S. Willoughby, Rhoda Altom, Suzanne Lile Hunter, Anne V. Farrell, and Faye Sarkowsky that same year. In the first two months of its inception, the Washington Women’s Foundation had 100 women members. In Cincinnati, Ohio, Three Generations Circle was formed in 1999 by Sondra Shaw-Hardy with 16 friends each giving $1,000. The group gave its first grants in 2001: $8,000 went to support the Women’s Resource Center’s Helen’s House shelter and another $8,000 went to three other community projects. History 2000-2015 The women’s giving circle group Impact100 formed in 2001. With this model, members give at least $1,000 annually and chapters are typically composed of at least 100 women, making sizeable contributions of at least $100,000 to the organizations who receive the grants. In 2003, Darryl Lester and Athan Lindsay received funding from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation and various sponsors to begin work with young African American adults in the South. These individuals organized into giving circles to invest their time, talent, and treasures back into their communities in an effort to address issues of race and equity. Linetta J. Gilbert was an early advocate for giving circles in communities of color in the US south through Ford Foundation’s Community Philanthropy, Race and Equity in the American South (CPREAS) initiative. There are now more than a dozen African-American giving circles that are members of Community Investment Network. A 2005 study at the University of Nebraska at Omaha, found that giving circles generally bring both long-time and new philanthropists to organized philanthropy. For both groups, participation seems to increase levels of giving while bringing "new money" to the nonprofit sector; especially to small and locally based organizations. Members also seem to learn about and give to organizations and individuals, and in areas of interest, they most likely would not have given to otherwise. In addition, members are more thoughtful, focused and strategic in their personal giving because of educational experiences in the giving circle. In Jackson, Michigan, Karen Dunigan formed the first chapter of 100 Women Who Care in November 2006. Dunigan invited 100 women to a meeting and asked them to each give $100. Today, there are hundreds of chapters under the umbrella organization 100 Who Care Alliance, with chapters of women, men, teens, and mixed groups. In a 2007 study, the Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers' New Ventures in Philanthropy initiative identified approximately 400 giving circles in the United States, more than double the number from two years earlier. A survey of 160 circles, published in 2008, found they had leveraged nearly $100 million, $13 million of this in 2006 alone. Nearly 12,000 people took part in the 160 giving circles surveyed. Nearly half of circles have male participants, and the popularity of giving circles is also growing among racial, ethnic and tribal communities as well as in the LGBTQIA2S+ community. One year later, Tim Hwang and friends started the Awesome Foundation to pool funds for projects by individuals. The number of giving circles in Asia is growing. The first study to describe and document Asian giving circles was published in 2013 by Dr. Rob John at the National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School. History 2016-present By 2016, a study conducted by the Collective Giving Research Group titled, "The Landscape of Giving Circles/Collective Giving Groups in the US" found there were more than 1,600 giving circles in the United States with 150,000 members across all 50 states. Their donations totaled roughly $1.29 billion since the organizations were founded. This growth was the catalyst for giving circle networks to convene and co-design an infrastructure organization. A 2019 study published by the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy showed that 20 million fewer Americans were donating to charity, resulting in a 13% decline in individual giving. To reverse the decline, leaders of several giving circles and giving circle networks received a seed grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Representatives from Amplifier, Philanos, the Asian Women’s Giving Circle, the Latino Community Foundation, and the Community Investment Network then collaborated to co-design a group to support new and existing giving circles called Philanthropy Together. Philanthropy Together was formed as a five-year initiative, which launched in April 2020, to increase the number of giving circles recorded in 2016 from 1,600 to 3,000 by the year 2025, with a collective donation amount $1 billion dollars from 350,000 people. In 2021, Philanthropy Together partnered with Grapevine, a giving circle technology platform, to create a Global Giving Circle Directory, which now serves as the most up-to-date research on the number of giving circles. 4. Location: Examples Reason and Request: The current Examples section has a flag, is inaccurate, and is outdated. Please replace and update the section with the proposed Giving circle networks and Giving circles Examples content. Existing Examples Section United States Examples of giving circles include the Zawadi giving circle, formed in 2005 in New Orleans, where 12 African American members collectively donated $24,000 over a two-year period. Their money has provided intensive math tutoring for students at a local school, along with other projects. The Queer Youth Fund, established in 2002 and based in Los Angeles, California, has invested more than $3 million in grants to small youth-led organizations in the United States and Canada that promote equality and justice for lesbian, gay, transgender, queer and questioning (LGBTQQ) youth. Founded in 2004, The African American Giving Circle of the Washington Area Women's Foundation has awarded over $120,000 in grants to community-based organizations in Washington, D.C. serving African American women and girls. Dining for Women (DFW) is a giving circle headquartered in Greenville, South Carolina with chapters in other parts of the United States, which raises monthly for international charities that support women and girls facing extreme challenges in developing countries. In 2006, Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders in Philanthropy (AAPIP) established a giving circle movement that has resulted in the distribution of over $2.2 million to Asian American communities across the United States. Included in this growing network of giving circles are the Lunar Giving Circle in San Francisco, Asian Giving Circle in Chicago, Cherry Blossom Giving Circle in Washington, D.C., and GVNGTogether in Boston, Massachusetts. In 2016, the Asian Women Giving Circle (AWGC) was studied by a Capstone team from New York University's Wagner School of Public Service. The team members were Carlos Rodriguez, Janice Lam, David Portalatin, Nicole Moriarty, and Paulina Toro. Amplifier (www.AmplifierGiving.org) is the first concerted effort to network Jewish giving circles, catalyze the creation of new giving circles, educate circle members on best practices in philanthropy, and create a platform to connect NGOs and Jewish giving circles to each other efficiently and effectively. The Amplifier network includes 50 giving circles and 369 organizations. The Amplifier website has a circle and organization directory, online common grant application system, and a resource library with information about how to start and sustain a giving circle. The New York Times reported in 2013 that a giving circle, Women for Social Innovation, is providing seed money for social innovators helping women, girls and families in Greater Philadelphia. In 2014, the Latino Community Foundation launched the first Latino Giving Circle Network in the United States. As of August 2016, there are over 220 members in this network, which focuses on investing in Latino-led organization in California. United Kingdom The Kew Giving Circle in Kew, south west London, started meeting in January 1999 and is still active. It is the first recorded giving circle in the United Kingdom. Its members contribute to a pooled Charities Aid Foundation account and meet to agree payments from the account to their selected charities. The Funding Network is the largest known and first open giving circle in the UK. It is a charity that runs Dragons' Den-style events to bring together potential donors and charities to fund positive social change. It has raised over £5 million for over 700 projects across the globe. Asia The number of giving circles in Asia is growing. The first study to describe and document Asian giving circles was published in 2013 by Dr Rob John at the National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School. Proposed Examples Section Giving circle networks A giving circle network is an organization that serves as a connector to giving circles, providing resources, guidelines and networking opportunities for multiple giving circles who may have shared interests. Examples of giving circle networks Amplifier Giving is the first concerted effort to network Jewish giving circles, catalyze the creation of new giving circles, educate circle members on best practices in philanthropy, and create a platform to connect NGOs and Jewish giving circles to each other efficiently and effectively. Amplifier collaborates with other organizations in the field including Honeycomb, a teen philanthropy program with giving circles housed in the Jewish Funders Network. Social Venture Partners was founded by Paul Brainerd. This group focused on applying long-term funding strategies that project a non-profit’s impact five to seven years into the future to ensure maximum benefits for the nonprofit, and matching appropriate volunteers with the organizations area of need. In 2006, Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders in Philanthropy (AAPIP) established a giving circle movement that has resulted in the distribution of over $2.2 million to Asian American communities across the United States. In 2012, the Latino Community Foundation launched the first Latino Giving Circle Network in the United States. As of August 2022, there are over 500 members in this network, which focuses on investing in Latino-led organizations in California. Together Women Rise is a giving circle network headquartered in Greenville, South Carolina with chapters in other parts of the United States, which raises monthly for international charities that support women and girls facing extreme challenges in developing countries. Future Now Fund, renamed The States Project in 2020, is a political action committee (PAC), giving circle network that helped organize 25 giving circles. In 2021, the American Muslim Community Foundation, the only foundation hosting giving circles that focus on the American Muslim community, distributed nearly $1.3 million to more than 150 charities. The American Muslim Community Foundation hosts six other giving circles including the American Muslim Women’s Giving Circle. Examples of giving circles Broad audience Broad audience giving circles focus on missions like social justice, workplace discrimination, human rights, and animal rights. The Kew Giving Circle in Kew, southwest London, started meeting in January 1999 and is still active. It is the first recorded giving circle in the United Kingdom. Based in Austin, Texas, Legacy Collective launched in 2015 to help families, businesses, and nonprofits survive financial hardship. During Winter Storm Uri in February 2021, Legacy Collective gave $577,500 in grants, including a $127,500 grant to the Sustainable Food Center to support local farmers. They also have $100,000 to Feeding Texas to support local food banks. Identity-based Approximately 60% of giving circles in the United States are considered identity-based. They represent women, minorities, religious groups, youth groups, LGBTQIA2S+, and more. Faith-based Faith-based giving circles like Mother Teresa Women’s Giving Circle, JewGood Harford, Ummah Giving Circle, and Tikkun Giving Circle, support causes and issues that serve the respective religious groups. Women's groups Women’s groups Impact Austin, Sisterhood of Philanthropists Impacting Needs (SPIN), Women’s Impact Fund, and Women for Social Innovation support women’s issues as well as provide an educational framework to recruit new female philanthropists and expand existing philanthropic groups. LGBTQIA2S+ groups Data released in 2018 showed that for every $100 awarded to philanthropic foundations in the United States, roughly 28 cents went to LGBTQIA2S+ groups. Giving circles like Beyond Two Cents, Kavod, Lacuna Giving Circle, and The Sex Worker Giving Circle support causes for demographic groups within the LGBTQIAS2+ community. Race/Ethnicity focus Race/ethnicity identity-focused giving circles use their donations to serve communities of color in matters of inclusivity, social justice, labor rights, and women’s rights. Founded in 2004, The African American Giving Circle of the Washington Area Women's Foundation has awarded over $120,000 in grants to community-based organizations in Washington, D.C. serving African American women and girls. The Asian Women Giving Circle, founded by Hali Lee in 2005 to support arts and cultural projects led by Asian-American women, takes a different approach. This 25-member group has a minimum $2,500 annual contribution; each member can raise those funds or donate them herself. Based in San Mateo County, California, Peninsula Latina Giving Circle (PLGC) formed in 2014 to fund local issues including early childhood education, mental health, and social justice. As of April 2022, PLGC has awarded more than $150,000 in grants to organizations supporting women, girls and families. 5. Location: Further Reading Reason and Request: The authors of the journals and papers added the current Further reading publications. The proposed section balances the section with a more broad, more concise list. Please replace the current section with the Proposed section. Current Further reading section Further reading Barclay, A. J. (2012). The Value of Giving Circles in the Evolution of Community Philanthropy, How community-based philanthropy can be strengthened by forging a bond between community foundations and Black giving circles in the United States. New York, NY: Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society at The Graduate Center, The City University of New York. Bearman, J. E. (2007). More giving together: The Growth and impact of giving circles and shared giving. Washington, DC: Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Giving circles: Philanthropy, voluntary association and democracy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press Eikenberry, A. M. & Bearman, J. (May, 2009). The Impact of giving together: Giving circles’ influence on members’ philanthropic and civic behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes. Washington, DC: Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers Fessler, Pam: Donors Turn To Giving Circles As Economy Drops, NPR, May 14, 2009 Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers (March, 2009) "Ten Basic Steps to Starting a Giving Circle" Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers, The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University, and The University of Nebraska Omaha (2009) "The Impact of Giving Together", report Hannon, Kerry: "Giving Circles: More Impact to Go Around", The New York Times, November 7, 2013 Hughes, Robert J: "When Small Donors Get Together", Wall Street Journal, updated May 18, 2007 Moody, M. (November, 2008). Becoming a venture philanthropist – Part I: Findings from a survey of Social Venture Partners in the United States and Canada. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Ostrander, S. A. (2007). "The growth of donor control: Revisiting the social relations of philanthropy". Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2007, 36, 356–372 Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors. (August, 2009). Diversity funds inventory. New York: Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Rutnik, T. A. & Bearman, J. (2005). Giving together: A national scan of giving circles and shared giving. Baltimore, Maryland: Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers Thiele, L., Eikenberry, A. M., Metton, J., & Millard, M. (2011). "Educating and empowering youth through philanthropy: A case study of a high school giving circle". Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 2, 31–46 Proposed Further reading section Further reading Rutnik, T. A. & Bearman, J. (2005). Giving together: A national scan of giving circles and shared giving. Baltimore, Maryland: Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers Bearman, J. E. (2007). More giving together: The Growth and impact of giving circles and shared giving. Washington, DC: Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Giving circles: Philanthropy, voluntary association and democracy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press Eikenberry, A. M. & Bearman, J. (May, 2009). The Impact of giving together: Giving circles’ influence on members’ philanthropic and civic behaviors, knowledge, and attitudes. Washington, DC: Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers Fessler, Pam: Donors Turn To Giving Circles As Economy Drops, NPR, May 14, 2009 Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers, The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University, and The University of Nebraska Omaha (2009) "The Impact of Giving Together", report Thiele, L., Eikenberry, A. M., Metton, J., & Millard, M. (2011). "Educating and empowering youth through philanthropy: A case study of a high school giving circle". Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 2, 31–46 Barclay, A. J. (2012). The Value of Giving Circles in the Evolution of Community Philanthropy, How community-based philanthropy can be strengthened by forging a bond between community foundations and Black giving circles in the United States. New York, NY: Center on Philanthropy and Civil Society at The Graduate Center, The City University of New York. 6. Location: External Links Reason and Request: The current External links section contains too many extraneous links. Please replace the current section with the Proposed section. Current External links section External links Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders in Philanthropy website Exponent Philanthropy: An Introduction to Giving Circles. Retrieved 7 June 2022. Exponent Philanthropy: Creating and Running a Giving Circle. Retrieved 7 June 2022. Community Investment Network: a national network of giving circles in the United States Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers: Ten basic steps to starting a giving circle, March, 2009. Donanino: A free platform to share gifts online Philanos (formally known as Women's Collective Giving Grantmakers Network) Proposed External links section External links What is a Giving Circle Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers: Ten basic steps to starting a giving circle References

Edit Suggestions for Giving circle Wikipedia article

2023 Edit Suggestions
1. Location: Lead Reason and Request: References