User talk:Cheery72

December 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Regina Calcaterra, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan^T 01:22, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan, you have made comments to this page before and the history of your comments and its content clearly show your bias and indicate who you are. Your posts are outdate and inaccurate. Cheery 71

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Regina Calcaterra with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —Frosty ☃ 05:02, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cheery72, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cheery72! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced prod

Hello - reinstating a removed proposed deletion template is against the PROD policy. If you want to propose the article be deleted, you must do so at articles for deletion. Meanwhile I suggest that you cease attempts to whitewash the Calcaterra article; Wikipedia is not a venue for public relations or burnishing images. Nathan^T 21:12, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you really think there are concerns with the content of the article, I suggest explaining your concerns at Talk:Regina Calcaterra. A one-word message of "libelous" is not enough to explain, since it seems you're trying to refute published sources from mainstream media as unreliable. Some discussion would go a long way to helping us understand what you're trying to do to improve the article. —C.Fred (talk) 17:29, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Regina Calcaterra has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Regina Calcaterra was changed by Cheery72 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865468 on 2014-12-16T17:31:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 02:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]