User talk:CheckDigit1

You're invited to the Teahouse.

Hello CheckDigit1, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! I want to invite you to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. I hope you see you there! Andrew³²⁷ 17:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice

I notice that you're new here to Wikipedia, and sometimes it can all be overwhelming for newcomers. I think it might be a good idea to slow down a bit and interact with editors a bit more before being bold - it still is a bit early. Specifically, I noticed that you accused an IP address of vandalism here for writing that Rashid Rida was an Ash'ari, yet that is what he is listed as on the Arabic version of the article. Frequently for articles on Muslim figures with few sources, information is taken from Arabic Wikipedia during the search for English language sources. The IP address may very well have performed the edit in good faith, and it's better to assume as such early on. Also keep in mind that accusations of vandalism, if found to be incorrect, could constitute violations of WP:NPA.
Just remember that this is a collaborative project and not a competition. I left some comments on Talk:Abū Ḥanīfa and Talk:Al-Ghazali. Check them out, review what I've said, and let's see if we can work positively to improve the encyclopedia. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:27, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I take your point about vandalism. However, I don't think the "Arabic version of wikipedia" is an authoritative source unless it is backed by neutral sources. The editor who claimed that Rashid Rida was an Ashari did so without providing an evidence. He / She also made similar changes to Hasan al-Banna's page and the Muslim Brotherhood. I think it was correct to remove this based on the lack of evidence.

I hope you don't mind that I indented your comment above. Also even on your own talk page, it's generally considered proper to sign comments with the four tildes (like four of these ~). Anyway, I'm not arguing against deleting unsourced info - I was only commenting on calling something vandalism when it didn't appear as such. Per Wikipedia:Translation, non-English Wikipedia articles are sometimes used to help with English Wikipedia and this is true across many different languages on the various Wikipedias. I hate to sound like a broken record, and I swear it isn't condescending from me, but I think you should make sure to slow down and err on the side of caution when addressing editing disuputes - you're still pretty new. Remember, not everybody is out there simply to push a certain opinion or turn the site into a joke. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:01, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hoping that you find the time to log in soon - your feedback and efforts do improve the encyclopedia, even if we disagreed about some things. Wikipedia always needs more volunteers. MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:56, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]