Jump to content

User talk:Chechendemocrat1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2024

[edit]

There is a need to rename the articles “First Chechen War” and “Second Chechen War” to “First Russo-Chechen War” and “Second Russo-Chechen War”. These labels emphasize the involvement of both parties in the conflict and avoid a one-sided presentation that could give the impression that only one side is responsible for the conflict. It can also help to better understand the geopolitical and historical background of the conflict by taking into account Russia's role as the dominant power in the region.

The title is based on WP:COMMONNAME. I am afraid that "Russo-Chechen War" is not the common name for the conflict. If you believe that this is not the case, you can mention some reliable sources at Talk:First Chechen War. Mellk (talk) 15:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Schrödinger's jellyfish  05:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]