User talk:CheapAlert

Welcome!

Hello, CheapAlert, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Merovingian (t) (c) 02:24, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

Buzda Likes You!

Hi! Buzda 06:52, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Fellow Granite Stater!

I saw that you were on [[Category:New Hampshire Wikipedians]], and I was wondering if you'd like to join us in improving content related to New Hampshire at Wikiproject New Hampshire. Please let me know if I can help you out with anything. karmafist 23:17, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Source for claim that HL2 and source engine is based on quake?

Could you please provide a source for your claim that the Source Engine is based on Quake? If you can't, then I'm removing that claim from the Quake page. I'm pretty sure valve started from a blank slate.DoomBringer 06:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"The Source engine is a 3D game engine developed largely internally by Valve Software" from the Source engine page. The words "developed largely internally" means that it was built by Valve, not by licensing Quake1. I'm reverting your edit. DoomBringer 06:21, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More: [1] "While Valve looked at licensing an engine for the sequel--such as id's Quake III engine--the team concluded that no outside technology was a good match for Valve's ambitious plans." Sorry, the claim you try to make is false. DoomBringer 06:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you check out Carmack's blog entry sometime in 2004 or early 05, he says he's not worried about how big HL2 would sell, as they're still paying royalties for Q1 engine use for HL2. That's one thing, also the null texture pattern, particle effects (TE_EXPLOSION, etc) and even mostly the same BSP format which are carried from HL are also found in the Quake engine. CheapAlert 22:54, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've already answered my one question (does Id still get royalties). I'll think about this. (see quake discussion page for a few of my concerns) DoomBringer 08:05, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red arremer on your userpage

Hi. I noticed you image on your userpage, and while its quite lovely, unfortunetly, Wikipedia's Wikipedia:fair use policy doesn't allow this. If you think there is a legitimate question as to its usability on Wikipedia please feel free to make an inquiry, but it cannot be allowed. It's a copyright matter and, this being a free encyclopedia whose ethos is very much based on respect for intellectual property, we should take it seriously. I won't remove it, but I thought it constructive to give you fair warning about this matter, as another user might not be so understanding. -Zero^Talk 14:31, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~You've taken no heed. I've since removed the image of violation from your userpage, and a re-inserion will probably result in a block. -Zero^Talk 14:26, 4 April 2006 (UTC)~~[reply]

I take it back and apologize for that hasty comment. I've reverted your userpage and its up to your descrestion to remove said image. We should follow the spirit of policy and not always strictly the letter. -Zero^Talk 14:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Red Arremer

The article Red Arremer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 01:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Red Arremer

I have nominated Red Arremer, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Arremer. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Neelix (talk) 02:55, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RedArremer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RedArremer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]