User talk:Chdant

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles “Bud” Dant has been accepted

Charles “Bud” Dant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:02, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments on Charles “Bud” Dant

Hello, a few comments on your article:

It's really weak on sourcing, but a glance at GoogleBooks shows a lot has been written about Dant that could be used, so I saw no reason to hold up what would eventually be a valid article anyway. I would however suggest you peruse GoogleBooks, and any other mentions you can find of Dant in books or news, and cite those articles to prove particular facts (particularly "claims to fame" that people might doubt if they are unsourced) to strengthen the article.

You messed up once and called him "Dad", so I fixed that for you. :) Speaking of which, sorry but we generally don't discuss spouses or children of Notable biography subjects except inasmuch as they themselves meet WP:Notability. Unless you or your sister become famous enough to have your own articles, including info about you, such as "survived by" is seen as namedropping, or as roping a private citizen into a public article. See WP:Notability is not inherited.

One way your relationship with Dant could be quite useful, however, is providing photos to illustrate the article. If you have any photos of him to which you own (or have inherited) the copyright, and wish to release them to the world under WP:Creative Commons, you may do so. If you'd rather not, or want instead to use an official photo, you may add one photo of Dant, regardless of copyright (such as one you just find anywhere online) under the WP:Fair Use rule since he is deceased. Just please follow the instructions at WP:Fair Use, which is a different process than uploading normal non-copyright personal photos.

Feel free to post on my Talk page if you have any questions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please refrain from inserting mention of yourself into the article. Unless you and your sister have your own articles, we don't need to include mention of you two in your father's article. MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:57, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

disagree with most of your remarks. Chdant (talk) 14:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Chdant. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Charles “Bud” Dant, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:06, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]