User talk:Chcgo undaground

November 2020

Hello, I'm Rsk6400. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mongoloid have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Rsk6400 (talk) 08:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm Troutfarm27. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to John Clauser have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Troutfarm27 ^(Talk) 18:34, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you bother to look at the edit you will see that in the article on John Clauser, it ends off by calling him a "climate change denial organization." This is a disgusting ad hominem attack which seeks to equate differences in scientific opinion about climate change with deniers that claim the Holocaust perpetrated by Nazi Germany in Europe was a fiction.

The reference for attributing that John Clauser is a "climate change denier" is an article in Korean from a business daily newspaper, meaning that outside of Korean language readers, no one can read the reference in order to make a determination of the article's veracity.

I'll tell you what does not appear to be constructive, that is foreign language references that can't be read by Wiki users.

I'm really tired of you political correctness police trolling Wikipedia for entries that do not conform to your opinions. Nicki_Toretto (talk) 11:05, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign language refs are perfectly allowed on WP. Climate change denial is no difference in scientific opinion, but simply pseudo-science, see WP:FRINGE for how to deal with pseudo-science. Rsk6400 (talk) 11:18, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Differences in opinion about climate change are not "pseudo-science." Unfortunately discussion about climate change is not scientifically neutral, which it ought to be, but instead is massively partisan which your trolling is proof positive of the same.

As to your foreign language reference, the site does not publish their material with an option for an alternate language, which guarantees that the reference cannot be challenged, since no one but a Korean language reader can review the material and yet at the same time you can make a claim ("climate change denier") and provide a reference for the claim but that nearly every one cannot dispute. Nicki_Toretto (talk) 19:59, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 08:45, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editor seems to be planning to evade their block.

Email to me "I'm not appealing since that involves asking for "clemency", I'm not sorry so why would I ask for clemency....plenty of workarounds on this.." Doug Weller talk 08:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]