User talk:Chazz88/Archive2

Sorry

My language might be a bit harsh. I am extremely Wikistressed right now. Forgive me. I'm sure you mean well. I'm just at the point where we're looking at probably mid January before this is even going to be voted on. Delaying that further just seems unnecessary. I've sent several requests to the arbcom to act and I've gotten nothing back. So I appreciate your plight, but really, it won't take you as long as you think. The basic issues are pretty straightforward. Alot of our case is Ben acting the same way over and over. He's consistent. I'll give him that. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 12:34, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I don't have a "goal" per se. I hope that he is taken off of the P-A and nuclear power articles because for 6 months now, we've seen very little positive change on either article. It's still sort of a mess and I don't see that changing with Ben working on it. He doesn't want to follow policy and he keeps putting up these POV edits that are impossible to work with. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 02:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clean up the Temp injunction section on the workshop page? It's gotten to be chicken scratch. :) And you seem to be good at that stuff. I'm eh. Thanks. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 04:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Colditz Castle

Hey sorry but I had to revert your changes, you basically neutered the entire section on escaping from Colditz. I instead spun off less critical sections to reduce page size. Please talk with me before you decide to do any other spin offs, as this could wind up making the article lose its Featured status that I worked for 2 months to obtain! ALKIVAR™ 13:14, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcoming people

Please welcome newcomers on their talk pages. Sceptr e ^(Talk) 20:43, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry. I was doing a batch of them and made a mistake with a block of welcomes. Again I apologize. I thank you for your speedy notifcation! --Chazz88 20:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great Work!

For wonderful counter-vandalism efforts, I, ViolinGirl, award you this barnstar. I was working on 68.74.70.253's blanking of his/her own talk page when I saw you beat me. Great work! --ViolinGirl^♪ 21:25, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You deserve it! :) Have a nice day!--ViolinGirl^♪ 21:40, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do I sign with tildes?

I got your message (thanks, btw) about signing with tildes, but I am still unsure how to do it. Can you post an example? Chewbacca 13:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew "p0rk" Munn

Andrew "p0rk" Munn is a candidate for speedy delete. The user has even reverted your change and removed the delete going against deletion policy. RFC-user?

(Comment verified as being from CyclePat 15:20, 2 January 2006 UTC by Chazz88)

BAP System

I am a complete newbie to wikipedia and apparently Melchoir thinks I am violating some rules, but my interpretation is different. He is suggesting the AFD process, but I don't really want to start off in wikipedia with a dispute. Am I really offbase in thinking that discovering a new way to run chess tournaments is important enough to be in wikipedia? The McMahon system is mentioned and it is not very widespread either. Please help, you are the only one that hasn't been antagonistic to me. With BAP being reported in newspaper, major chess website, minor chess websites, widespread recognition among NW chessplayers, including WCF officials, it sure seems to me to warrant inclusion. The traditional point system is presented as being the only point system, so it is factually incorrect. Is it right to let Wikipedia remain factually incorrect?

The thread between me and Melchoir is on my talk page. Not sure if it matters, but I am one of the top 20 strongest tournament players in the state of Washington.

Clint Ballard 15:41, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chazz88,

You are a newbie's best friend!!

Clint Ballard 00:36, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/(KCC)

You've nominated an article for deletion, but from the AFD page, one cannot make out which article you have nominated. Do you mean KCC. If so, you should add {{subst:afd}} on the article so that users can get to know that it has been nominated for deletion. I myself cannot make out why you feel that article is vandalism. Please reply on my talk page.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 ($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 16:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

enlighten me about objectivity in wikipedia (and thks for welcoming)

Hi there.

I am French and now living in France, though I have spent 9 years living and working in Asia and the US, and I value different views brought by international sources (BBC News, CNN, NY Times...). I know how difficult communication between different cultures is, even about what looks like simple ideas, and I know how much one should be able to question one's own convictions once in a while.

I registered because I have been surprised by the way foreign medias have communicated on the "2005 civil unrest in France" and what understanding readers got out of it: pure facts have been mixed with interpretation, leaving to the reader the freedom of picking what is fact and what is not... this problem has been reproduced into the wikipedia article "2005 civil unrest in France" to an even worse extent.

Journalists are supposed to investigate directly on the field (and here it means interviewing the French themselves by the way) to have their own understanding, and produce words that will fairly report and explain to their targetted readers. At the same time, the same information with the same words will be understood differently by each individual, according to its own prior understanding and environment.

The danger in wikipedia is that secondary readers of secondary sources can become primary editors! Though I think it is a much bigger challenge to write in wikipedia than it is to write in the New York Times: you don't know your readers and what is their prior knowledge and understanding of your subject, and that's particularly true in the English version of wikipedia that will be used by any person in the entire planet as a reference!

Truth lies in the eye of the beholder! Since that article and many others after, my faith in wikipedia as a reliable source with universal value has been questionned, and I can't trust the "anyone can edit" principle anymore. That was a nice dream, though. Marco21 16:54, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello, I am frechn man. I speak a little english. And I make interwiki link. :). Tatadalala 01:27, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for your support of my RfA; I appreciate your confidence. Best wishes for a happy new year, Tom Harrison ^Talk 13:16, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thanks for the welcome, I've been poking around for some time and the New Year is as good a time as any to sign up. I hope I can contibute to Wikipedia what little knowledge I have.

Britishink 18:00, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greeting.

Hey, thanks for the welcome. Iffer 01:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Request for Adminship

Hey, thanks for voting in my RfA, I got it! :) If you need anything, just give me a shout. - FrancisTyers 00:30, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hi,
I just want to say thanks for supporting me on my request for adminship! It passed by a 58/3/0 margin, so I am now an administrator. If you need me to help you out, or you find that I'm doing anything wrong, please don't hesitate to contact me. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 19:04, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AMA

Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome. Izehar 22:17, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Many thanks for your Strong Support on my request for adminiship, I'm sure you'll be glad to know the final result was 92/1/0. I am now an administrator and (as always) if I do anything you have issue with, please talk about it with me. --Alf ^melmac 09:45, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

English Foxhound photo

You uploaded this photo, which appears to come from [[1]], which has a copyright notice posted. If you are the copyright holder for that site, can you please state so explicitly and also indicate the true source for the photo (photographer or other clearly public-domain site)? Thanks. Elf | Talk 21:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please identify the sources of files that you upload from other places and, if you think they're fair use or public domain, state why you think that's the case (per wikipedia guidelines)? Applies both to foxhound and to Image:Field Spaniel.jpg. If you look at the latter, you'll see that you've used an obsolete PD tag anyway & it needs the correct one. I'm removing the photos from the articles until this is cleared up a bit better. Thanks. Elf | Talk 01:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate vote

You voted both support (currently #145) and neutral (currently #4) at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/SimonP. Could you please remove one of these? —Cryptic (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks from rogerd

File:Baseball (ball) closeup.jpg

Hi Chazz88- Thanks for your support on my RfA. I appreciate the kind words that you used in your comments. If I can be of any service please leave me a message --rogerd 01:27, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks Chazz88/Archive2

Thanks for your recent support on my RfA. It passed with a final vote of 24/1/2 :-). If you ever need anything, feel free to leave me a message! --Admrboltz (T | C) 04:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks

Thanks for supporting me in my RFA. --TimPope 13:52, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD vote on Science fiction Western

Hey, Chazz. I noticed your vote on the AfD for "Science fiction Western. I'm not an expert on AfD, but I think that votes without any comment are often discounted. You might like to go back and add a comment about why you think the article is worth keeping, or why the arguments for deletion aren't persuasive. (You also forgot to sign — I put the "unsigned" template on for you.) Thanks! —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 20:04, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NoSeptember's RfA

Thank you, Chazz88, for your support of my RfA. If you ever need for anything, please contact me. I will do my best in my new role and welcome your feedback. NoSeptember ^talk 13:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you, Chazz88/Archive2
	for voting in my RFA. It failed with a result of 31/11/2. Thanks for voting! If you have any comments, please say so here.

AfD Thanks

Please accept my embarrassingly belated thank you for supporting my RfA, which much to my surprise passed 102/1/1, earning me minor notoriety. I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have already started doing the things people wanted me to be able to do. And hopefully nothing else... Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C]

AfD? 12:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fromeast-450.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fromeast-450.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 07:49, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AMA Coordinator Election

Dear AMA Member,

You are entitled to vote in the AMA Coordinator election, set to begin at midnight on 3 February 2006. Please see the pages on the election and its candidates and the procedure and policy and cast a vote by e-mail!

Wally 11:04, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Benjamin Gatti

A final decision has been published in this case.

For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 00:22, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:EnglishFoxhound.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:EnglishFoxhound.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:Javanese.gif

I listed Image:Javanese.gif at WP:PUI. I suggest you not upload anymore nonfree copyrighted images of animals. It's extremely unlikely that any will be fairuse. If possible, take an image of an animale. If that's not possible, hope somebody else does. Also, per WP:FAIR, you can never use fairuse images on your user page. Sorry. --Rob 11:27, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AMA

Hello, you are receiving this message because your name is on the list of members of the Association of Members' Advocates. There is a poll being held at Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates for approval of a proposal for the revitalisation of the association. You are eligible to vote and your vote and input are welcome.Gator (talk) 14:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]