User talk:Chartax

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Chartax (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

194.83.96.23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Douche999". The reason given for Douche999's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Dougweller (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Obvious sock. Blocking this account too. — Closedmouth (talk) 08:51, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a sock, whatever the hell that is.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Chartax (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message

Blocking administrator: not provided (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: This is not an autoblock. You are directly blocked for the inappropriate use of multiple accounts. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chartax (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is NOT a multiple account of Douche999. My account was not created using the same IP address. The IP address used by 'Douche999' was that of my college. I am in no way a multiple of 'Douche999' - Check account creation dates. Please unblock this account. I would also like this block (and autoblock) EXPUNGED by Wikipedia. Not just proven innocent, EXPUNGED.

Decline reason:

Nah. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Turtle, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Turtle was changed by Chartax (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-04T14:09:24+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Virginia Eliza Clemm Poe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Angelo (talk) 09:56, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]