User talk:Charlotte Lennox

Journal of Literary Theory

Gibt es ausch belastbare Auflagenzahlen? --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 13:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was heißt belastbar? Bei wissenschaftlichen Publikationen ist das ja eher so um die paar hundert. Kann ich aber rausfinden. Ist das notwendig für den Artikel? Charlotte Lennox (talk) 16:35, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, (werde auf Englisch weiter gehen, damit andere Editors dies auch lesen können :-) To show that a journal is notable under WP's criteria is not easy. The indexing information that you posted on the talk page help. To give you some more ides, please have a look at the notability guideline for academic journals that I recently proposed. It is not accepted by the community yet, but it may give you some ideas about the kind of information that would be needed to show that the journal meets WP's criteria. I would not keep JLTonline separate from JLT, there is too much overlap (they even use the same website) and it is not unusual for a journal's website to have material that is not in the printed version. Hope this helps. --Crusio (talk) 09:10, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the article has been deleted. I recommend that before recreating it, you write it in your userspace at User:Charlotte_Lenox/Sandbox, this time providing some references about indexing, etc, that may help in showing notability. Let me know if I can help. --Crusio (talk) 13:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Journal of Literary Theory

The article Journal of Literary Theory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Journal having questionable notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 22:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of JLTonline

The article JLTonline has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:WEB]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 22:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

I have created a sandbox for you here. As for notability, this is indeed a problem for many academic journals, not only those in the humanities. The simple fact that a journal exists is not enough. The guidelines that I have proposed are (hopefully) a way to get around WP:N, which requires publications in independent reliable sources about the subject of a WP article. As there are preciously few articles being written about journals, almost no academic journals would ever fulfill WPs notability guidelines... --Crusio (talk) 14:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Journal of Literary Theory

I have nominated Journal of Literary Theory, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Literary Theory. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Crusio (talk) 15:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]